Re: [sixties-l] New Movie on SDS

From: David Horowitz (
Date: 09/26/00

  • Next message: "Re: [sixties-l] New Movie on SDS"

    Spoken lilke a true Stalinist Marty. If were still on the left I would have an
    academic sinecure for six figures, courtesty of my political comrades, and would
    waltz into campuses collecting five figure fees (how many speeches do you think
    say a Communist hack like Angela Davis gives in a year at $25,000 a pop?) Or some
    Hollywood halfwit named Greenwald would be doing my biopic. Of course there are
    leftwing losers (maybe we should call them "idealists") who are still doing it on
    a volunteer basis. Just for the record, not that you would care, I am supported
    by 40,000 contributors across the United States, many of them no better-heeled
    than you. I like to think of it as a movement. Just for old times' sake.
    Marty Jezer wrote:
    > Moderator:
    > I've pretty much stayed out of the bashing Horowitz stuff, but enough is
    > enough.
    > Horowitz is paid by right-wing foundations to attack the left.  It's his
    > job to attack,
    > disrupt and harass radicals. The rest of us are doing this on our spare
    > time because
    > the subject interests us. I'm certainly not against controversy, but it
    > should be honest.
    > Howorwitz is not an honest contributor.  He's a paid agitator.
    > In the interst of full disclosure, Horowitz ought to tell us which
    > foundations he's flacking for, and how much they give him.
    > Marty
    > At 11:45 AM 9/23/2000 -0700, you wrote:
    > >Well, the Sixties wasn't just about sex, drugs and rock and roll, and that's
    > >not
    > >what the American public thinks. It was also about sappy involvement
    > .........

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : 09/27/00 EDT