If I were in a meeting and the person continued to disrupt the meeting or attack the purpose of the meeting, I'd ask that person to leave. I erase all messages from and about Horowitz. As there was evidence presented here that Horowitz is getting paid to disrupt and attack forums like this one and if it is true, I would ask Horowitz to leave. If he didn't leave, I'd simply cut him off. My opinion... best, Don Monkerud >Moderator: >I've pretty much stayed out of the bashing Horowitz stuff, but enough is >enough. >Horowitz is paid by right-wing foundations to attack the left. It's his >job to attack, >disrupt and harass radicals. The rest of us are doing this on our spare >time because >the subject interests us. I'm certainly not against controversy, but it >should be honest. >Howorwitz is not an honest contributor. He's a paid agitator. > >In the interst of full disclosure, Horowitz ought to tell us which >foundations he's flacking for, and how much they give him. > >Marty > >At 11:45 AM 9/23/2000 -0700, you wrote: >>Well, the Sixties wasn't just about sex, drugs and rock and roll, and that's >>not >>what the American public thinks. It was also about sappy involvement >.........
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : 09/27/00 EDT