[tei-council] Preparation for F2F meeting

[Peter Stadler]

Am 16.11.2014 um 09:40 schrieb Martin Holmes <mholmes at uvic.ca>:

> I think if you're offering validation, it's no use unless you provide
> good feedback, so I would offer as much detail as possible.
Yes, sure. I only wonder if that needs to be the first step or if we can’t start with valid/invalid. 
That simple feedback would already allow to use the validation service in various processing pipelines where you just want to filter for valid or invalid files. (That’s definitely something for machines, a human reader needs more details.)

Best
Peter
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 455 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
Url : http://lists.village.Virginia.EDU/pipermail/tei-council/attachments/20141116/483ecdc4/attachment.bin