[tei-council] listRelation membership in model.biblLike

[Sebastian Rahtz]

On 14 Jun 2013, at 12:56, Lou Burnard <lou.burnard at retired.ox.ac.uk>
 wrote:
> 
> "For clarity, the new <listRelation> element (which would contain 
> <relation> elements) would be allowed in the same places as the 
> to-be-deprecated <relationGrp> except that it would also be added to 
> model.biblLike so that bibl, biblStruct, and biblFull could contain 
> <relation> elements without needing to wrap these <relation> elements in 
> <relationGrp>."
> 
> If the intent is (as I think this comment suggests) to allow <relation> 
> within <bibl> and friends, then clearly adding it to model.biblLike 
> won't cut it: the relevant class would be model.biblPart. I think that's 
> a corrigible error and I propose to corridge it, unless there is strong 
> objection.

That doesn't solve the problem, as it misses out the " and friends" clause.
But I agree, its better than nothing, and probably what Kevin asked for.

See if it breaks anything….

> It leaves aside the broader question as to where else <relation>, or 
> <relationGrp> elements should be permitted. That probably needs a 
> separate and longer discussion.


true


roll on /TEI/linkedData
--
Sebastian Rahtz      
Director (Research) of Academic IT
University of Oxford IT Services
13 Banbury Road, Oxford OX2 6NN. Phone +44 1865 283431