[tei-council] Should Roma be doing this?

[Sebastian Rahtz]

On 8 Apr 2013, at 11:23, James Cummings <james.cummings at it.ox.ac.uk> wrote:

>  I also agree that order being important (or not) is something 
> that should be able to be captured (@ordered as a boolean?) but 
> think it is separate from the classification.  My <list 
> type="recipeSteps"> classifies what type of list it is, but 
> *also* has a requirement that order is important.
> 
> Whether these are numbered steps or bulleted is entirely a 
> rendering thing in my opinion.



effectively, we're moving the currently widely used set of @type values
into @rend, then. Which is very reasonable. But _highly_ disruptive
to many many existing projects and tools.

discuss at f2f, sure. but lets be wary of this eating up a lot to time,
cos the implications are scary.
--
Sebastian Rahtz      
Director (Research) of Academic IT
University of Oxford IT Services
13 Banbury Road, Oxford OX2 6NN. Phone +44 1865 283431