[tei-council] Sourceforge Upgrade

[Gabriel Bodard]

As I've just commented on that doc, two things:

(1) the old tracker urls in sourceforge automatically redirect to the 
new ones after migration, which is a relief;

(2) the new urls are much nicer, about as transparent and nice as the 
purls, in fact. (There may still be good reason for using 
purls--persistence--but the niceness of the urls is no longer one.)

As a result, I think we've answered all the "Beforehand" part of Kevin's 
doc. The conversion of old URLs would still be nice, but is not a 
blocker to proceeding, in my opinion.

G

On 2013-03-12 14:30, Kevin Hawkins wrote:
> I've made it publicly viewable and will continue granting write access
> as people request.
>
> As I've written in this document, I think we should check a few things
> before we push the button.  There might be some additional scripting we
> can do that will leave us with fewer inconveniences following the migration.
>
> On 3/12/2013 10:27 AM, Gabriel Bodard wrote:
>> Thanks Kevin. Can you make that doc publicly viewable?
>>
>> On 2013-03-12 14:12, Kevin Hawkins wrote:
>>> On 3/12/2013 7:59 AM, Gabriel Bodard wrote:
>>>> Should we get started soon?
>>>
>>> Absolutely!  I think it's better to do this on our timeline rather than
>>> have them do it for us on their timeline (the end of the month, as you
>>> noted above).
>>>
>>>> Has someone started a survey of all the
>>>> places where the SVN url will need to be updated?
>>>
>>> Not quite.  I think this list would go under step 2 of "During" at:
>>>
>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1E0aV-E75VOLE_TCrEXVVqaez-9zlyDcpCTeF5QP2BPI/edit#
>>>
>>

-- 
Dr Gabriel BODARD
Researcher in Digital Epigraphy

Digital Humanities
King's College London
Boris Karloff Building
26-29 Drury Lane
London WC2B 5RL

T: +44 (0)20 7848 1388
E: gabriel.bodard at kcl.ac.uk

http://www.digitalclassicist.org/
http://www.currentepigraphy.org/