[tei-council] tagUsage/@render

[Martin Holmes]

These look good to me. The last example (beginning with "Hmmm") doesn't 
have any linebreaks in it, so it makes the page scroll horizontally.

Looking at the chapter, though, I see this example:

<said rend="PRE+lsquo POST+rsquo">

while in the said.xml, we have this:

<said aloud="true" rend="pre(“) post(”)">

I wonder if we should be consistent there? Although anything token-like 
goes in @rend, people tend to think of examples in the Guidelines as a 
bit authoritative, so it might be confusing to see two ways of doing the 
same thing.

I still have trouble disambiguating <q> from <said>, and <q> from 
<quote>. I have malicious thoughts towards <q>.

Cheers,
Martin

On 12-12-20 08:35 AM, Sebastian Rahtz wrote:
>
> On 20 Dec 2012, at 16:29, James Cummings <james.cummings at it.ox.ac.uk> wrote:
>
>>>> Are we entirely agreed about this, that the long-standing phrase "_ is to be_ rendered." is not what
>>>> we intend?
>>>
>>> I agree. I thought all the various rendition-related stuff was designed
>>> to describe what the source document looked like.
>>
>> I agree certainly, as I've argued many times all rendition in TEI
>> should be about the source document
>
> tagUsage/@render is now in line, as per John McC's wording in SF ticket.
>
> someone want to look at http://bits.nsms.ox.ac.uk:8080/jenkins/job/TEIP5/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/release/doc/tei-p5-doc/en/html/ref-said.html
> and see if they like the examples of quotation marks? would you rather these appear in the main chapter?
> --
> Sebastian Rahtz
> Director (Research Support) of Academic IT Services
> University of Oxford IT Services
> 13 Banbury Road, Oxford OX2 6NN. Phone +44 1865 283431
>

-- 
Martin Holmes
University of Victoria Humanities Computing and Media Centre
(mholmes at uvic.ca)