[tei-council] Lite Final

[Gabriel BODARD]

On 28/07/2012 17:35, Sebastian Rahtz wrote:
> I think that if we mention CSS in the Lite doc, it is effectively making
> a decision to come down 100% on the side of John Walsh's
> SF ticket. If we don't want to do that, then it is highly inappropriate
> to sneak it into Lite by the back door. So let us make the CSS decision
> first....

I agree. Mentioning CSS in Lite would be going against what it looks 
like we're about to decide in response to ticket 
<http://purl.org/tei/fr/3519866>. Instead, why not mention @rendition in 
Lite?

G


-- 
Dr Gabriel BODARD
(Research Associate in Digital Epigraphy)

Department of Digital Humanities
King's College London
26-29 Drury Lane
London WC2B 5RL

Email: gabriel.bodard at kcl.ac.uk
Tel: +44 (0)20 7848 1388
Fax: +44 (0)20 7848 2980

http://www.digitalclassicist.org/
http://www.currentepigraphy.org/