[tei-council] latest Tite DTD?

[James Cummings]

Could I just remind TEI Technical Council members that their 
posts are publicly archived? For example, I understand the joking 
about Apex is light-hearted but remember that some people may 
stumble across your messages out of context.  That the TEI Tite 
DTD diverged at all is unfortunate, but I'm sure you guys can 
bring everything back in line. As far as I'm aware Apex have been 
helpful and useful to the TEI-C in providing a membership 
benefit, and have always been above board in their dealings with us.


On 28/06/12 10:36, Sebastian Rahtz wrote:
>
> On 28 Jun 2012, at 10:26, Kevin Hawkins wrote:
>>
>> If you really find differences in (b), don't those count as a Tite
>> variant?  Why would you conclude that they don't have their own variant?
>>
> because the differences are meaningless.  those entities are not referenced. I
> suspect its some small
>
>> In any case, something is still not right.  Their prose documentation
>> mentions<handShift/>, does not mention<biblScope>, etc., yet all of
>> these are still in the DTD.  So they never got around to changing the
>> DTD, or they are as devious as Sebastian fears.  I suspect incompetence,
>> not deviousness.
>
> i'll vote for devious :-}
>
> --
> Sebastian Rahtz
> Head of Information and Support Group
> Oxford University Computing Services
> 13 Banbury Road, Oxford OX2 6NN. Phone +44 1865 283431
>
> Sólo le pido a Dios
> que el futuro no me sea indiferente
>


-- 
Dr James Cummings, InfoDev
Oxford University Computing Services
University of Oxford