[tei-council] latest Tite DTD?

[Lou Burnard]

Well, at least no-one has (so far) said "You've got a week and a bit to 
get your shit together, otherwise I'm blowing the airport sky high!"


On 28/06/12 19:15, James Cummings wrote:
>
>
> Could I just remind TEI Technical Council members that their
> posts are publicly archived? For example, I understand the joking
> about Apex is light-hearted but remember that some people may
> stumble across your messages out of context.  That the TEI Tite
> DTD diverged at all is unfortunate, but I'm sure you guys can
> bring everything back in line. As far as I'm aware Apex have been
> helpful and useful to the TEI-C in providing a membership
> benefit, and have always been above board in their dealings with us.
>
>
> On 28/06/12 10:36, Sebastian Rahtz wrote:
>>
>> On 28 Jun 2012, at 10:26, Kevin Hawkins wrote:
>>>
>>> If you really find differences in (b), don't those count as a Tite
>>> variant?  Why would you conclude that they don't have their own variant?
>>>
>> because the differences are meaningless.  those entities are not referenced. I
>> suspect its some small
>>
>>> In any case, something is still not right.  Their prose documentation
>>> mentions<handShift/>, does not mention<biblScope>, etc., yet all of
>>> these are still in the DTD.  So they never got around to changing the
>>> DTD, or they are as devious as Sebastian fears.  I suspect incompetence,
>>> not deviousness.
>>
>> i'll vote for devious :-}
>>
>> --
>> Sebastian Rahtz
>> Head of Information and Support Group
>> Oxford University Computing Services
>> 13 Banbury Road, Oxford OX2 6NN. Phone +44 1865 283431
>>
>> Sólo le pido a Dios
>> que el futuro no me sea indiferente
>>
>
>