[tei-council] latest Tite DTD?

[Sebastian Rahtz]

On 28 Jun 2012, at 10:26, Kevin Hawkins wrote:
> 
> If you really find differences in (b), don't those count as a Tite 
> variant?  Why would you conclude that they don't have their own variant?
> 
because the differences are meaningless.  those entities are not referenced. I
suspect its some small 

> In any case, something is still not right.  Their prose documentation 
> mentions <handShift/>, does not mention <biblScope>, etc., yet all of 
> these are still in the DTD.  So they never got around to changing the 
> DTD, or they are as devious as Sebastian fears.  I suspect incompetence, 
> not deviousness.  

i'll vote for devious :-}

--
Sebastian Rahtz      
Head of Information and Support Group
Oxford University Computing Services
13 Banbury Road, Oxford OX2 6NN. Phone +44 1865 283431

Sólo le pido a Dios
que el futuro no me sea indiferente