[tei-council] next release?

[Kevin Hawkins]

Whereas in past meetings Lou and/or others would add comments to tickets 
directly as we discussed them, at this meeting we generally recorded 
decisions only in the minutes (which are in a Google Docs file that 
Becky shared a week ago).  So you have to look for your initials to find 
any tasks assigned to you and then see what the decision reached was.

On 4/23/2012 1:35 PM, Gabriel BODARD wrote:
> In terms of doing the release tech, I guess I need to put aside at least
> a day to work through this, and it doesn't matter much to me when that
> day is, so that's fine.
>
> I'm now just trying to remember if there were any tickets assigned to me
> in the meantime, and if I'll have time to complete them by May 20. I was
> going to look into the guidelines-wide impact of something, but I don't
> recall exactly what. Did someone add a note to the ticket in question?
> (And in what may be the answer to the same or may be a completely
> unrelated question, could someone update http://purl.com/tei/fr/3416130
> with the current state of Council thinking after Ann Arbor, please?)
>
> (Incidentally, I think http://purl.com/TEI/BUGS/3496949 has been
> erroneously assigned to me--I don't think I know what we're meant to do
> with this.)
>
> Gabby
>
> On 23/04/2012 16:47, James Cummings wrote:
>>
>> How about we set a notional target release date of 25 May?  (This
>> is about 5 weeks from now.) If we assume that we want most things
>> completed by the end of Sunday 20th, to allow time for
>> proofreading and error spotting.
>>
>> Does that sounds reasonable to most people?
>>
>> Gaby: Most importantly, does the proposed Release Technician like
>> these dates?
>>
>> -James
>>
>>
>> On 21/04/12 18:50, Martin Holmes wrote:
>>> Three weeks will be a bit tough for me, and a couple of the tickets I
>>> have might turn out to have unpredicted side-effects (like the tei_
>>> prefix). As long as we have the option to launch without the change if
>>> it proves difficult, we could go with three weeks.
>>>
>>> The attributes-without-examples problem is so large that we'll just have
>>> to hack away at it steadily.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Martin
>>>
>>> On 12-04-21 04:03 AM, Sebastian Rahtz wrote:
>>>> something we forgot to debate in Ann Arbor was a timetable
>>>> for the next release, I think? i.e. what is the due date for
>>>> everyone to complete their ticket work so that Sir Gabriel
>>>> of B'odard can undertake his Quest.
>>>>
>>>> speaking for myself, if I don't do my assignments
>>>> more or less immediately I will not get to them for ages,
>>>> so I favour a short window (say, 3 weeks).
>>>>
>>>> Sebastian
>>
>>
>