[tei-council] Next Release; Codename: GroundHog Day

[James Cummings]

A reminder that we are meant to be proofreading the release 
today. So have a look at
http://teijenkins.hcmc.uvic.ca:8080/job/TEIP5-Documentation/ws/
and
http://teijenkins.hcmc.uvic.ca:8080/job/TEIP5-Documentation/ws/Guidelines-web/en/html/index.html

And point out anything (except for version and date) which are 
wrong.  If you are able to and believe it is a corrigible error 
then go and fix it and commit them by midnight tonight. 
Otherwise comment to the list for someone else to do so.

If you can each spend an hour or so today looking at it, 
hopefully will pick up some additional errors.

-James

On 31/01/12 17:28, Gabriel Bodard wrote:
> I have no strong feelings either way, but my understanding was that it
> was argued the addition of geo to att.declaring was an obvious bug-fix,
> and so shouldn't require a 2.1. (If I'm mistaken, or even if I'm correct
> but people disagree with this argument, then go ahead and name it 2.1.0.)
>
> G
>
> On 2012-01-31 16:02, Martin Holmes wrote:
>> I think there has been at least one schema-affecting change:
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> r10035 | gabrielbodard | 2012-01-12 09:54:18 -0800 (Thu, 12 Jan 2012) |
>> 1 line
>>
>> added<geo>   to att.declaring
>>
>> So I guess we should be going for 2.1.0.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Martin
>>
>>
>> On 12-01-31 07:01 AM, James Cummings wrote:
>>>
>>> Just a reminder that any bugs, typos, corrections, and
>>> schema-affecting changes you've spotted in the Guidelines should
>>> be fixed by midnight tonight.  This gives us all of Wednesday 1st
>>> of Feb for proofreading and corrections of any additional typos
>>> we find, with an intended release by MartinH on Thursday 2 February.
>>>
>>> Is the next release going to be 2.1.0 or 2.0.2?  Correct me if
>>> I'm wrong but If there have been schema-affecting changes then
>>> the second number is meant to increment. Have there been
>>> schema-affecting changes since 2.0.1?
>>>
>>> -James
>>>
>>> On 18/01/12 00:13, James Cummings wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> Since no one else has piped up, can I suggest a schedule:
>>>>
>>>> 31 January midnight GMT: submission deadline of significant changes
>>>> 1 February: Whole Day for council to proofread and correct typos.
>>>> 2nd February: Release (Codename: Groundhog Day)
>>>>
>>>> Since Martin asked, I suggest him as release technician.
>>>>
>>>> Any reasons why these dates are wholly unsuitable?
>>>>
>>>> -James
>>>>
>>>> On 17/01/12 16:11, Gabriel Bodard wrote:
>>>>> Has there been any consensus on when 2.0.2 might be put out?
>>>>>
>>>>> (I ask because, if it's soon I won't both hacking the EpiDoc schema to
>>>>> allow geo/@decl; I'll just wait for TEI to introduce it and regenerate
>>>>> the schema properly. :-) )
>>>>>
>>>>> G
>>>>>
>>>>> On 2012-01-12 17:39, Martin Holmes wrote:
>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I think we need to release a 2.0.2 soon, during which we again run
>>>>>> through the instructions, after adding the tagging instruction. Should
>>>>>> we do a quick trawl through the tickets and decide which ones might beS
>>>>>> polished off quickly without controversy?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Can I be the one to go through the release steps this time?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>> Martin
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 12-01-12 08:27 AM, Peter Stadler wrote:
>>>>>>> Dear geeks again,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> again wondering: just downloaded the current release 2.0.1 from sourceforge (tei-2.0.1.zip) and the editionStmt at tei-2.0.1/xml/tei/p5subset.xml reads<edition>2.0.0 Last updated on<date when="2011-12-16">16th December 2011</date>.</edition>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Does that mean it wasn't updated at all or is just the editionStmt wrong?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Many thanks again
>>>>>>> Peter
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>


-- 
Dr James Cummings, InfoDev,
Computing Services, University of Oxford