[tei-council] Next Release; Codename: GroundHog Day

[Rebecca Welzenbach]

Hi folks,

I know I'm late--it's before midnight here, but not where the rest of
you are--but found one typo:

In 1.3.1 Attribute Classes, the sentence

"This class is however a subclass of the att.pointing class, from
which its members also inherit the attributes type and evaluate."

ought to be, I think,

"This class is however a subclass of the att.pointing class, from
which its members also inherit the attributes *target* and evaluate."

also submitted to sourceforge as a bug report.

On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 7:48 AM, James Cummings
<James.Cummings at oucs.ox.ac.uk> wrote:
>
> A reminder that we are meant to be proofreading the release
> today. So have a look at
> http://teijenkins.hcmc.uvic.ca:8080/job/TEIP5-Documentation/ws/
> and
> http://teijenkins.hcmc.uvic.ca:8080/job/TEIP5-Documentation/ws/Guidelines-web/en/html/index.html
>
> And point out anything (except for version and date) which are
> wrong.  If you are able to and believe it is a corrigible error
> then go and fix it and commit them by midnight tonight.
> Otherwise comment to the list for someone else to do so.
>
> If you can each spend an hour or so today looking at it,
> hopefully will pick up some additional errors.
>
> -James
>
> On 31/01/12 17:28, Gabriel Bodard wrote:
>> I have no strong feelings either way, but my understanding was that it
>> was argued the addition of geo to att.declaring was an obvious bug-fix,
>> and so shouldn't require a 2.1. (If I'm mistaken, or even if I'm correct
>> but people disagree with this argument, then go ahead and name it 2.1.0.)
>>
>> G
>>
>> On 2012-01-31 16:02, Martin Holmes wrote:
>>> I think there has been at least one schema-affecting change:
>>>
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> r10035 | gabrielbodard | 2012-01-12 09:54:18 -0800 (Thu, 12 Jan 2012) |
>>> 1 line
>>>
>>> added<geo>   to att.declaring
>>>
>>> So I guess we should be going for 2.1.0.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Martin
>>>
>>>
>>> On 12-01-31 07:01 AM, James Cummings wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Just a reminder that any bugs, typos, corrections, and
>>>> schema-affecting changes you've spotted in the Guidelines should
>>>> be fixed by midnight tonight.  This gives us all of Wednesday 1st
>>>> of Feb for proofreading and corrections of any additional typos
>>>> we find, with an intended release by MartinH on Thursday 2 February.
>>>>
>>>> Is the next release going to be 2.1.0 or 2.0.2?  Correct me if
>>>> I'm wrong but If there have been schema-affecting changes then
>>>> the second number is meant to increment. Have there been
>>>> schema-affecting changes since 2.0.1?
>>>>
>>>> -James
>>>>
>>>> On 18/01/12 00:13, James Cummings wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>
>>>>> Since no one else has piped up, can I suggest a schedule:
>>>>>
>>>>> 31 January midnight GMT: submission deadline of significant changes
>>>>> 1 February: Whole Day for council to proofread and correct typos.
>>>>> 2nd February: Release (Codename: Groundhog Day)
>>>>>
>>>>> Since Martin asked, I suggest him as release technician.
>>>>>
>>>>> Any reasons why these dates are wholly unsuitable?
>>>>>
>>>>> -James
>>>>>
>>>>> On 17/01/12 16:11, Gabriel Bodard wrote:
>>>>>> Has there been any consensus on when 2.0.2 might be put out?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> (I ask because, if it's soon I won't both hacking the EpiDoc schema to
>>>>>> allow geo/@decl; I'll just wait for TEI to introduce it and regenerate
>>>>>> the schema properly. :-) )
>>>>>>
>>>>>> G
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 2012-01-12 17:39, Martin Holmes wrote:
>>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I think we need to release a 2.0.2 soon, during which we again run
>>>>>>> through the instructions, after adding the tagging instruction. Should
>>>>>>> we do a quick trawl through the tickets and decide which ones might beS
>>>>>>> polished off quickly without controversy?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Can I be the one to go through the release steps this time?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>> Martin
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 12-01-12 08:27 AM, Peter Stadler wrote:
>>>>>>>> Dear geeks again,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> again wondering: just downloaded the current release 2.0.1 from sourceforge (tei-2.0.1.zip) and the editionStmt at tei-2.0.1/xml/tei/p5subset.xml reads<edition>2.0.0 Last updated on<date when="2011-12-16">16th December 2011</date>.</edition>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Does that mean it wasn't updated at all or is just the editionStmt wrong?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Many thanks again
>>>>>>>> Peter
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Dr James Cummings, InfoDev,
> Computing Services, University of Oxford
> --
> tei-council mailing list
> tei-council at lists.village.Virginia.EDU
> http://lists.village.Virginia.EDU/mailman/listinfo/tei-council
>
> PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived