[tei-council] version 2.0.1 p5subset.xml states "edition 2.0.0"

[Martin Holmes]

Which blocklist are you using? We should go after that one too.

Cheers,
Martin

On 12-01-18 08:17 AM, Gabriel Bodard wrote:
> For the record it's still not fixed for me. When I look at
> <http://www.tei-c.org/release/doc/tei-p5-doc/en/html/MS.html#msad>  in
> Firefox, I see no section 10.9.
>
> (There are several filters in use in ABP--the only one that we have
> confirmation have approved an exception for this is the one Martin made
> the request to...)
>
> If we could fix this with a rewrite, then it would be invisible to most
> people, and therefore not look silly at all.
>
> G
>
> On 2012-01-18 15:53, Lou Burnard wrote:
>> I would also vote for doing nothing. I really dont see any good reason
>> to over-react in this way, especially since (if I understand correctly)
>> this problem was rectified by the filtering agency within 48 hours of
>> our reporting the problem. We would introduce a whole load of broken
>> links to counter a non-existent problem which only ever affected a small
>> number of people. If we are serious about wanting to rationalise the
>> identifiers, then we should do it properly, once for all, not in a piece
>> meal haphazard fashion. That just looks silly.
>

-- 
Martin Holmes
University of Victoria Humanities Computing and Media Centre
(mholmes at uvic.ca)