[tei-council] version 2.0.1 p5subset.xml states "edition 2.0.0"

[Gabriel Bodard]

For the record it's still not fixed for me. When I look at 
<http://www.tei-c.org/release/doc/tei-p5-doc/en/html/MS.html#msad> in 
Firefox, I see no section 10.9.

(There are several filters in use in ABP--the only one that we have 
confirmation have approved an exception for this is the one Martin made 
the request to...)

If we could fix this with a rewrite, then it would be invisible to most 
people, and therefore not look silly at all.

G

On 2012-01-18 15:53, Lou Burnard wrote:
> I would also vote for doing nothing. I really dont see any good reason
> to over-react in this way, especially since (if I understand correctly)
> this problem was rectified by the filtering agency within 48 hours of
> our reporting the problem. We would introduce a whole load of broken
> links to counter a non-existent problem which only ever affected a small
> number of people. If we are serious about wanting to rationalise the
> identifiers, then we should do it properly, once for all, not in a piece
> meal haphazard fashion. That just looks silly.

-- 
Dr Gabriel BODARD
(Research Associate in Digital Epigraphy)

Department of Digital Humanities
King's College London
26-29 Drury Lane
London WC2B 5RL

Email: gabriel.bodard at kcl.ac.uk
Tel: +44 (0)20 7848 1388
Fax: +44 (0)20 7848 2980

http://www.digitalclassicist.org/
http://www.currentepigraphy.org/