[tei-council] version 2.0.1 p5subset.xml states "edition 2.0.0"

[Lou Burnard]

On 18/01/12 15:38, Paul F. Schaffner wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Jan 2012, James Cummings wrote:
>
>> On 18/01/12 12:54, Sebastian Rahtz wrote:
>>>> 2&   3 both have the problem that is bothering Sebastian, but 3 is of
>>>> course much worse in this case (2 being in practice (a) easy and (b)
>>>> relatively minor inconvenience to anybody). I don't suppose you can
>>>> write a rewrite rule for file fragments, can you?
>>> yes, given careful thought, I think we could trap #msad and rewrite to #mssad.
>>> I'm not volunteering, mind, you can spend whole days understanding
>>> Apache mod_rewrite :-}
>>
>> Any disagreements that this is the right course of action?
>
> If I had to vote, I'd go with 'do nothing.' People who filter content
> have to know that the filters are imperfect--that they may be trapping
> dolphins with their catch of tuna.
>

I would also vote for doing nothing. I really dont see any good reason 
to over-react in this way, especially since (if I understand correctly) 
this problem was rectified by the filtering agency within 48 hours of 
our reporting the problem. We would introduce a whole load of broken 
links to counter a non-existent problem which only ever affected a small 
number of people. If we are serious about wanting to rationalise the 
identifiers, then we should do it properly, once for all, not in a piece 
meal haphazard fashion. That just looks silly.