[tei-council] Bug: make geo declaring

[Gabriel Bodard]

No, you're right. When I wrote that email it looked much more like a 
consensus (at least that adding @decls to <location> was harmless) than 
it did by the time it hit the list.

I've added decls to geo, but not to location, for now, pending further 
discussion. Will look at the surrounding prose and report here what I 
think needs clarified/changed.

G


On 2012-01-12 20:42, Kevin Hawkins wrote:
> Is there really consensus to make<location>  a member of att.declaring?
>    I don't see that.  --Kevin
>
> On 1/12/12 6:44 AM, Gabriel Bodard wrote:
>> There's been a little bit of discussion on the ticket, and it looks like
>> we're more or less agreed that we could reasonable make both<geo>   and
>> <location>   members of att.declaring. I'll implement this today if no one
>> objects, but I thought I'd ask here if anyone wants to weigh in on the
>> minor debate between Martin and myself first...
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Gabby
>>
>> On 2012-01-10 16:30, Gabriel Bodard wrote:
>>> Dear Councillors,
>>>
>>> A reminder of a bug ticket that was submitted last November (just too
>>> late to make it into the last release, apparently), suggesting that
>>> <geo>    be added to att.declaring:
>>>
>>> http://purl.org/TEI/BUGS/3440771
>>>
>>> If everyone is agreeable, I'm happy to go ahead and make this change in
>>> the source. (I know it won't be released for a while now, but if I do it
>>> now we won't forget in future.)
>>>
>>> Best,
>>>
>>> Gabby
>>>
>>

-- 
Dr Gabriel BODARD
(Research Associate in Digital Epigraphy)

Department of Digital Humanities
King's College London
26-29 Drury Lane
London WC2B 5RL

Email: gabriel.bodard at kcl.ac.uk
Tel: +44 (0)20 7848 1388
Fax: +44 (0)20 7848 2980

http://www.digitalclassicist.org/
http://www.currentepigraphy.org/