[tei-council] reviewing genetic editing revisions incorporated into last successful build (Re: Thisare the droids you are looking for)
lou.burnard at retired.ox.ac.uk
Sat Nov 26 04:40:41 EST 2011
Hi Piotr. Sorry I missed these earlier -- dont know how
On 08/11/11 01:34, Piotr Bański wrote:
> * "inadvertant"
> * I realise this was mentioned today (well, yesterday), but I am uneasy
> looking at the interplay of cancellations encoded as<restore> vs. the
> "cancelled" value of gap/@reason, which does not refer to restoration,
> qualifying<gap>. I realise that this is about cancelling of text or
> cancelling of a deletion mark, but possibly the former can be described
> by a different verb ("remove", "erase", "delete", since it's a *gap*?),
> just to avoid the juxtaposition with two different clashing imageries,
> of restoration and removal.
not sure, will look at this passage again
> * "signalled by the largere"
> * "and then use the<target> attribute on a single undo element: "
nothing i can see wrong here
> * Something that Lou mentioned to me today: "transposeGrp supplies a
> list of transpositions..." well, then call it a list, while there's
> still time, to maintain the ordered-unordered distinction?
yes, in hand.
> * Capitalization in the section titles is inconsistent.
> * "insofaras"
> <gb> at 9 am.? Sigh...
More information about the tei-council