[tei-council] reviewing genetic editing revisions incorporated into last successful build (Re: Thisare the droids you are looking for)

[Lou Burnard]

Hi Piotr. Sorry I missed these earlier -- dont know how

On 08/11/11 01:34, Piotr Bański wrote:
> * "inadvertant"

oops

>
> * I realise this was mentioned today (well, yesterday), but I am uneasy
> looking at the interplay of cancellations encoded as<restore>  vs. the
> "cancelled" value of gap/@reason, which does not refer to restoration,
> qualifying<gap>. I realise that this is about cancelling of text or
> cancelling of a deletion mark, but possibly the former can be described
> by a different verb ("remove", "erase", "delete", since it's a *gap*?),
> just to avoid the juxtaposition with two different clashing imageries,
> of restoration and removal.

not sure, will look at this passage again

>
> * "signalled by the largere"
>

oops


> * "and then use the<target>  attribute on a single undo element: "
>

nothing i can see wrong here


> * Something that Lou mentioned to me today: "transposeGrp supplies a
> list of transpositions..." well, then call it a list, while there's
> still time, to maintain the ordered-unordered distinction?

yes, in hand.

>
> * Capitalization in the section titles is inconsistent.
>


OK


> * "insofaras"
>

????



>
> <gb>  at 9 am.? Sigh...
>

???????



>    P.
>
>
>