[tei-council] reviewing genetic editing revisions incorporated into last successful build (Re: Thisare the droids you are looking for)

[Martin Holmes]

 >> * "and then use the<target>   attribute on a single undo element: "
 >>
 >
 > nothing i can see wrong here

I think he means it should be <att>target</att>, not <gi>target</gi>

Cheers,
Martin

On 11-11-26 01:40 AM, Lou Burnard wrote:
> Hi Piotr. Sorry I missed these earlier -- dont know how
>
> On 08/11/11 01:34, Piotr Bański wrote:
>> * "inadvertant"
>
> oops
>
>>
>> * I realise this was mentioned today (well, yesterday), but I am uneasy
>> looking at the interplay of cancellations encoded as<restore>   vs. the
>> "cancelled" value of gap/@reason, which does not refer to restoration,
>> qualifying<gap>. I realise that this is about cancelling of text or
>> cancelling of a deletion mark, but possibly the former can be described
>> by a different verb ("remove", "erase", "delete", since it's a *gap*?),
>> just to avoid the juxtaposition with two different clashing imageries,
>> of restoration and removal.
>
> not sure, will look at this passage again
>
>>
>> * "signalled by the largere"
>>
>
> oops
>
>
>> * "and then use the<target>   attribute on a single undo element: "
>>
>
> nothing i can see wrong here
>
>
>> * Something that Lou mentioned to me today: "transposeGrp supplies a
>> list of transpositions..." well, then call it a list, while there's
>> still time, to maintain the ordered-unordered distinction?
>
> yes, in hand.
>
>>
>> * Capitalization in the section titles is inconsistent.
>>
>
>
> OK
>
>
>> * "insofaras"
>>
>
> ????
>
>
>
>>
>> <gb>   at 9 am.? Sigh...
>>
>
> ???????
>
>
>
>>     P.
>>
>>
>>
>