[tei-council] Disambiguation of <ident> and <idno> (and also <gi>)
mholmes at uvic.ca
Wed Nov 23 15:53:15 EST 2011
On 11-11-23 12:15 PM, Sebastian Rahtz wrote:
> On 23 Nov 2011, at 00:16, Martin Holmes wrote:
>> My initial impulse is to supplement these descriptions with something
>> along these lines:
>> <ident> should be used for tokens such as variable names, class names,
>> type names, function names etc. in formal programming languages. (It
>> should not be used for element and attribute names in XML, for which the
>> special elements<gi> and<att> are provided.)
>> <idno> should be used for labels which uniquely identify an object or
>> concept in a formal cataloguing system such as a database or an RDF
>> store, or in a distributed system such as the World Wide Web.
> yes, I like the word "uniquely" there.<ident> is to label something
> as an identifier in a passive sort of way,<idno> is a much more
> positive claim, and (critically) has a _context_, of thing it is identifying.
I like this idea of context, but it suggests that the context must be
supplied. In other words, this is OK:
but this alone would not be:
However, the obvious (recursive) issue is how the context is
contextualized. What if "isbn" means nothing to me? Do I have to define
it too, in the context of something else, and on and on until finally we
arrive at a URL?
And since we've been talking elsewhere about deprecating @key in favour
of custom protocols, wouldn't this do just as well?
The more I look at this stuff, the more of a mess it seems.
You're definitely right that <q> should be <ident> below. I missed that one.
> <p> variable<ident>name</ident> is declared here</p>
> makes sense, but
> <p> variable<idno>name</idno> is declared here</p>
> means ??? supplies an ID for this para? anyway, wrong.
>> 1. Do you think that my explanatory text is accurate and helpful enough
>> to do the job of disambiguating these two elements?
> its good. do you think my ideas about context fly?
>> 2. Does our usage of the tags in the Guidelines comply with what we
>> believe to be the use-cases of the elements? (Ignoring for the moment
>> the case of the questionable uses of<ident> below.)
> yes, from your list.
>> Here the same text has been classified as of categories<val>b.a4</val> and
>> <val>b.d2</val> within the Brown classification scheme (presumed to be
>> available from<ident
>> type="file">http://www.example.com/browncorpus</ident>), and as of category
>> <q>A45</q> within the SUC classification scheme documented at the URL
> I think I might use<ptr> there :-} the<q> should be<ident>, though?
> Stormageddon Rahtz
> Head of Information and Support Group, Oxford University Computing Services
> 13 Banbury Road, Oxford OX2 6NN. Phone +44 1865 283431
> Sólo le pido a Dios
> que el futuro no me sea indiferente
University of Victoria Humanities Computing and Media Centre
(mholmes at uvic.ca)
More information about the tei-council