[tei-council] surfaces, surfaceGrps, etc. [was : minutes/release deadline]

[Laurent Romary]

That's my understanding as well, even if I think I am missing some of the details here (I have not managed to conceptualize things, which is needed for me to think...)

Le 20 nov. 2011 à 12:12, Sebastian Rahtz a écrit :

> 
> On 20 Nov 2011, at 00:27, Martin Holmes wrote:
> 
>> 
>> I think we agreed that since <surface> is always establishing a 
>> coordinate system, and a coordinate system must always be rectangular, 
>> we don't need @points on <surface>, only on <zone>.
>> 
>> That gives us the rather odd possibility of a non-rectangular <zone> 
>> which contains a <surface> that must have a rectangular coordinate 
>> system, though.
> 
> I'd rather think  of <surface> defining the extent of a two-dimensional
> grid, and <zone> as describing polygon areas within that. Then my
> head does not hurt so much. 
> 
> 
> 
> --
> Stormageddon Rahtz      
> Head of Information and Support Group, Oxford University Computing Services
> 13 Banbury Road, Oxford OX2 6NN. Phone +44 1865 283431
> 
> Sólo le pido a Dios
> que el futuro no me sea indiferente
> 
> -- 
> tei-council mailing list
> tei-council at lists.village.Virginia.EDU
> http://lists.village.Virginia.EDU/mailman/listinfo/tei-council
> 
> PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived

Laurent Romary
INRIA & HUB-IDSL
laurent.romary at inria.fr