[tei-council] signed/list

[stuart yeates]

On 20/11/11 08:02, Sebastian Rahtz wrote:
> One thing this discussion shows up is the varying views of what<list>
> is. In some minds, it is a block-level object, and abusive
> in a phrase-level context. In other minds, it is a typographic
> feature used widely all over the place, even within phrases
> (liked<signed>).

The computer scientist in me is saying that this is a text-book case for 
parameterisation.

Do any of the extant schema languages have the ability to express 
something like "the <item> can contain anything that would be valid in 
place of the enclosing <list>"?

cheers
stuart