[tei-council] span span span span span span span span glorious span
James Cummings
James.Cummings at oucs.ox.ac.uk
Fri Aug 19 12:04:13 EDT 2011
On 19/08/11 16:29, Lou Burnard wrote:
> I'd like to propose the following set of rules.
>
> 1. @target behaves as elsewhere in the Guidelines -- it's a URL, which
> can point to one or more whole elements, or xpath-defined substrings
agreed.
> 2. @spanTo is also (as elsewhere) a URL., but it must point to a
> *single* element.
agreed.
> 3. it is erroneous to supply both attributes on the same element.
agreed.
> 4. if only @target is supplied, the passage/s affected are all the
> element content fragments indicated by the URIs supplied, treated as a
> single unit
agreed.
> 5. if only @spanTo is supplied, the passage affected is the sequence of
> content fragments that begins immediately following the element
> concerned and finishes immediately preceding whatever element is
> indicated by the @spanTo attribute.
possibly disagree:
a) because of the non-linear transcription of some of the genetic
materials, I'm suspicious that the @spanTo may in fact point
backwards in the XML tree. (Potentially, while still pointing
'forward' in an intellectual structure of a document?) I think
that the spanning follows the document order is an assumption.
(I take your point that processing spanning the other way is a
potential *nightmare*)
b) I know you weren't necessarily going to use this wording but I
also find 'immediately following the element concerned' a
possible source of confusion, if and only if, @spanTo ever used
on an element which has content. (I'm assuming it shouldn't be.)
> 6. if neither attribute is supplied, the markup is erroneous
Agreed. One of them is required, seems reasonable to me.
> <p>blah<delSpan spanTo="#delEnd"/> blah</p>
> <p>blah<anchor xml:id="delEnd"/> blah</p>
> (a)<p>blah blah</p>
> or
> (b)<p>blah</p><p>blah</p>
b, since this is deletion. The deletion applies to the content,
not the markup we have interpreted and added. (ok, I sense a
genetic-editions-of-born-digital-objects-objection possible to my
certainty.)
My two pence,
-James
--
Dr James Cummings, InfoDev,
Computing Services, University of Oxford
More information about the tei-council
mailing list