[tei-council] <licence> inside <availability>

[Lou Burnard]

Yes, I think I started the implementation of this ticket, and stalled. 
It happens.

Looking at the email list I see that on 25/4 I posted a message asking 
if anyone could suggest some example licencese to cite, which didnt seem 
to get any response. So that's probably what I was waiting for.


On 18/08/11 18:36, Martin Holmes wrote:
> Hi Lou,
>
> I sent this (below) to the Council list, but I suspect you missed it,
> and on investigation I see that it was you who checked in
> Specs/licence.xml on April 25. Did you get half-way through the process
> and stop for some reason, or did it just get forgotten?
>
> Cheers,
> Martin
>
> On 11-08-17 06:05 PM, Martin Holmes wrote:
>> I may be misunderstanding something here, but this ticket is still open:
>>
>> <http://purl.org/TEI/FR/3086675>
>>
>> and it looks to me as though it's been partially implemented. The
>> licence element has been created (licence.xml in P5/Source/Specs), but I
>> don't think it's been added to the content model of<availability>, nor
>> are there any examples of its usage. Am I missing something, or did the
>> implementation get stalled for some reason, or perhaps inadvertently?
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Martin
>> _______________________________________________
>> tei-council mailing list
>> tei-council at lists.village.Virginia.EDU
>> http://lists.village.Virginia.EDU/mailman/listinfo/tei-council
>>
>> PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived
>>
>