[tei-council] @sortKey -- haven't we discussed this?

[Laurent Romary]

Indeed, the two tickets seem to converge in the same direction. Please Martin compile this in an FR for att.sortable


Le 18 août 2011 à 00:51, Martin Holmes a écrit :

> Update: This ticket:
> 
> <http://purl.org/TEI/FR/3309636>
> 
> suggests adding <idno> to att.sortable too, and I'm convinced by the 
> explanation.
> 
> On 11-08-17 03:36 PM, Martin Holmes wrote:
>> I've just been looking at this ticket:
>> 
>> <http://purl.org/TEI/FR/2984463>
>> Add @sortKey to<bibl>  - ID: 2984463
>> 
>> The last comment on it was 2010, we have discussed this recently (the
>> end of May), and I think the consensus was that there was justification
>> for creating a class att.sortable, to which<bibl>,<biblStruct>,
>> <list*>  and<msDesc>  would belong, but I can't find any subsequent action.
>> 
>> Did we just lose track of this one? If so, I'm happy to create a
>> fully-detailed feature request for att.sortable.
>> 
>> Cheers,
>> Martin
>> 
> 
> -- 
> Martin Holmes
> University of Victoria Humanities Computing and Media Centre
> (mholmes at uvic.ca)
> _______________________________________________
> tei-council mailing list
> tei-council at lists.village.Virginia.EDU
> http://lists.village.Virginia.EDU/mailman/listinfo/tei-council
> 
> PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived

Laurent Romary
INRIA & HUB-IDSL
laurent.romary at inria.fr