[tei-council] @sortKey -- haven't we discussed this?

Martin Holmes mholmes at uvic.ca
Wed Aug 17 18:51:54 EDT 2011

Update: This ticket:


suggests adding <idno> to att.sortable too, and I'm convinced by the 

On 11-08-17 03:36 PM, Martin Holmes wrote:
> I've just been looking at this ticket:
> <http://purl.org/TEI/FR/2984463>
> Add @sortKey to<bibl>  - ID: 2984463
> The last comment on it was 2010, we have discussed this recently (the
> end of May), and I think the consensus was that there was justification
> for creating a class att.sortable, to which<bibl>,<biblStruct>,
> <list*>  and<msDesc>  would belong, but I can't find any subsequent action.
> Did we just lose track of this one? If so, I'm happy to create a
> fully-detailed feature request for att.sortable.
> Cheers,
> Martin

Martin Holmes
University of Victoria Humanities Computing and Media Centre
(mholmes at uvic.ca)

More information about the tei-council mailing list