[tei-council] @sortKey -- haven't we discussed this?
mholmes at uvic.ca
Thu Aug 18 11:17:21 EDT 2011
I've done that:
The other two tickets should be closed, but I don't have permissions to
Could someone do that (or perhaps give me permission to do it)?
On 11-08-18 12:22 AM, Laurent Romary wrote:
> Indeed, the two tickets seem to converge in the same direction. Please Martin compile this in an FR for att.sortable
> Le 18 août 2011 à 00:51, Martin Holmes a écrit :
>> Update: This ticket:
>> suggests adding<idno> to att.sortable too, and I'm convinced by the
>> On 11-08-17 03:36 PM, Martin Holmes wrote:
>>> I've just been looking at this ticket:
>>> Add @sortKey to<bibl> - ID: 2984463
>>> The last comment on it was 2010, we have discussed this recently (the
>>> end of May), and I think the consensus was that there was justification
>>> for creating a class att.sortable, to which<bibl>,<biblStruct>,
>>> <list*> and<msDesc> would belong, but I can't find any subsequent action.
>>> Did we just lose track of this one? If so, I'm happy to create a
>>> fully-detailed feature request for att.sortable.
>> Martin Holmes
>> University of Victoria Humanities Computing and Media Centre
>> (mholmes at uvic.ca)
>> tei-council mailing list
>> tei-council at lists.village.Virginia.EDU
>> PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived
> Laurent Romary
> INRIA& HUB-IDSL
> laurent.romary at inria.fr
University of Victoria Humanities Computing and Media Centre
(mholmes at uvic.ca)
More information about the tei-council