[tei-council] Taking another ticket (2976715)

[Laurent Romary]

I would say yes to this, but we need to secure this in the minutes: Lou?

Le 21 avr. 2011 à 05:24, Martin Holmes a écrit :

> Now I come to look at the minutes again, I realize I only understand 
> half of this:
> 
>> "Ticket 2976715: We agreed to add<distributor>  to model.respLike,
> 
> ...got that...
> 
>> and
>> to use model.respLike within content models passim.
> 
> ...but that bit isn't really clear to me. My comment on the ticket in 
> October proposed two changes:
> 
> 1. Add <distributor> to model.respLike, for consistency with 
> <principal>, <funder> and <sponsor>.
> 
> 2. Replace explicit references to author | editor | respStmt in the
> content model of biblStruct with a reference to the model.respLike 
> class, so that <distributor>, <funder>, <sponsor> and <principal> are 
> available where <author>, <editor> and <respStmt> currently are.
> 
> Does the second bit in the minutes refer to #2 above?
> 
> Cheers,
> Martin
> 
> On 11-04-20 10:46 AM, Martin Holmes wrote:
>> Hi there,
>> 
>> If no-one objects, I propose to implement this decision from the minutes:
>> 
>> "Ticket 2976715: We agreed to add<distributor>  to model.respLike, and
>> to use model.respLike within content models passim. The distinction
>> between intellectual responsibility and responsibility for distrribution
>> might be sorted out later."
>> 
>> The second half of that ticket, which asks that "model.respLike be added
>> to<analytic>,<monogr>  and<series>, so that these elements are
>> available in<biblStruct>  citations" was presumably rejected or not
>> addressed -- does anyone remember which?
>> 
>> Cheers,
>> Martin
> _______________________________________________
> tei-council mailing list
> tei-council at lists.village.Virginia.EDU
> http://lists.village.Virginia.EDU/mailman/listinfo/tei-council
> 
> PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived

Laurent Romary
INRIA & HUB-IDSL
laurent.romary at inria.fr