[tei-council] Taking another ticket (2976715)

[Martin Holmes]

Now I come to look at the minutes again, I realize I only understand 
half of this:

 > "Ticket 2976715: We agreed to add<distributor>  to model.respLike,

...got that...

 >  and
 > to use model.respLike within content models passim.

...but that bit isn't really clear to me. My comment on the ticket in 
October proposed two changes:

1. Add <distributor> to model.respLike, for consistency with 
<principal>, <funder> and <sponsor>.

2. Replace explicit references to author | editor | respStmt in the
content model of biblStruct with a reference to the model.respLike 
class, so that <distributor>, <funder>, <sponsor> and <principal> are 
available where <author>, <editor> and <respStmt> currently are.

Does the second bit in the minutes refer to #2 above?

Cheers,
Martin

On 11-04-20 10:46 AM, Martin Holmes wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> If no-one objects, I propose to implement this decision from the minutes:
>
> "Ticket 2976715: We agreed to add<distributor>  to model.respLike, and
> to use model.respLike within content models passim. The distinction
> between intellectual responsibility and responsibility for distrribution
> might be sorted out later."
>
> The second half of that ticket, which asks that "model.respLike be added
> to<analytic>,<monogr>  and<series>, so that these elements are
> available in<biblStruct>  citations" was presumably rejected or not
> addressed -- does anyone remember which?
>
> Cheers,
> Martin