[tei-council] Taking another ticket (2976715)
mholmes at uvic.ca
Wed Apr 20 23:24:23 EDT 2011
Now I come to look at the minutes again, I realize I only understand
half of this:
> "Ticket 2976715: We agreed to add<distributor> to model.respLike,
> to use model.respLike within content models passim.
...but that bit isn't really clear to me. My comment on the ticket in
October proposed two changes:
1. Add <distributor> to model.respLike, for consistency with
<principal>, <funder> and <sponsor>.
2. Replace explicit references to author | editor | respStmt in the
content model of biblStruct with a reference to the model.respLike
class, so that <distributor>, <funder>, <sponsor> and <principal> are
available where <author>, <editor> and <respStmt> currently are.
Does the second bit in the minutes refer to #2 above?
On 11-04-20 10:46 AM, Martin Holmes wrote:
> Hi there,
> If no-one objects, I propose to implement this decision from the minutes:
> "Ticket 2976715: We agreed to add<distributor> to model.respLike, and
> to use model.respLike within content models passim. The distinction
> between intellectual responsibility and responsibility for distrribution
> might be sorted out later."
> The second half of that ticket, which asks that "model.respLike be added
> to<analytic>,<monogr> and<series>, so that these elements are
> available in<biblStruct> citations" was presumably rejected or not
> addressed -- does anyone remember which?
More information about the tei-council