[tei-council] TEI Workgroups

[Laurent Romary]

I would implement c) in such a way that we keep this general notion of SIG, possibly with duties, and yes, implement d) with this perspective in mind. Makes sense? (I may still be jetlagged)
Laurent

Le 17 avr. 2011 à 17:10, Kevin Hawkins a écrit :

> Laurent,
> 
> For the record, the discussion you are referring to was in Galway in 
> 2008, not Dublin in 2010.  That's what I put in my draft attachment.
> 
> By "work this out step by step", do you mean not do (c) and/or (d) at 
> this time?  Or leave this page entirely as it is for now?
> 
> Kevin
> 
> On 4/17/2011 10:53 AM, Laurent Romary wrote:
>> The main issue is that workgroups (cf. discussion in Dublin, 2008)
>> are vestigial organs from the past. SIG were supposed to be a kind of
>> flexible umbrella for a wide variety of activity from pure
>> networking, to actually task oriented group (manuscript SIG).
>> Flexibility has become unflexible (if I may say so), but we should
>> probably work this out step by step. Cheers, Laurent
>> 
>> 
>> Le 17 avr. 2011 à 05:40, Kevin Hawkins a écrit :
>> 
>>> In Chicago, Elena incidentally gave the background on these
>>> "workgroups", so attached is a proposed revision to
>>> 
>>> http://www.tei-c.org/Activities/Workgroups/index.xml
>>> 
>>> As you'll see, I have:
>>> 
>>> a) added the feature structures workgroup (which was missing from
>>> the page but is discoverable from the navigation menu at left)
>>> 
>>> b) Moved the two inactive workgroups to the "no longer active"
>>> section.
>>> 
>>> c) Added some context on workgroups vs. SIGs (thanks, Elena!)
>>> 
>>> d) Added the two active workgroups that I know of.
>>> 
>>> David Sewell: if no objections are raised by next weekend, please
>>> put up this new version.
>>> 
>>> Thanks
>>> 
>>> On 4/12/11 5:48 PM, Kevin Hawkins wrote:
>>>> When we were looking at the rules for SIGs, Brett discovered that
>>>> there are also "workgroups":
>>>> 
>>>> http://www.tei-c.org/Activities/Workgroups/index.xml
>>>> 
>>>> Please let me know in the next week if there are any objections
>>>> to me asking David Sewell to move the personography and physical
>>>> bibliography workgroups to the bottom list (of workgroups that
>>>> have "concluded their activity") and add to the top of the list
>>>> the following:
>>>> 
>>>> * Ad-hoc Committee on Encoding of Bibliographic Citations
>>>> 
>>>> * Task Force for TEI Tite
>>>> 
>>>> I can write content for these two pages and link to their work
>>>> underway.
>>>> 
>>>> Are there any other workgroups to add to this list?
>>>> 
>>>> --Kevin _______________________________________________
>>>> tei-council mailing list tei-council at lists.village.Virginia.EDU
>>>> http://lists.village.Virginia.EDU/mailman/listinfo/tei-council
>>>> 
>>>> PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived
>>> <index.xml>_______________________________________________
>>> tei-council mailing list tei-council at lists.village.Virginia.EDU
>>> http://lists.village.Virginia.EDU/mailman/listinfo/tei-council
>>> 
>>> PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived
>> 
>> Laurent Romary INRIA&  HUB-IDSL laurent.romary at inria.fr
>> 
>> 
>> 
> _______________________________________________
> tei-council mailing list
> tei-council at lists.village.Virginia.EDU
> http://lists.village.Virginia.EDU/mailman/listinfo/tei-council
> 
> PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived

Laurent Romary
INRIA & HUB-IDSL
laurent.romary at inria.fr