[tei-council] a proposal for a change to ODD (copy of ticket I just put in SF)
lou.burnard at oucs.ox.ac.uk
Fri Mar 5 05:10:12 EST 2010
Not wishing to be drawn into speculation about what Laurent may or may
not have in mind, I do think there is a case to be made for saying that
when I ask for a given element, I actually mean "this element and all
its possible children". In other words, I want this element to behave as
if it and its possible children were a distinct module.
This is not the same as saying "I want this element and all its
mandatory children" of course -- I believe that ODD processors are
required to do this already (whence the presenece of so many zombies)
Hence my proposal on the SF ticket for an additional attribute on
<elementSpec> (or <elementref> if we go that way)
Sebastian Rahtz wrote:
> On 5 Mar 2010, at 07:23, Laurent Romary wrote:
>> Second, we need to simplify the listing of needed elements by
>> introducing a simplified version of 'cristals'
> I think what you have in mind really is "design patterns", viz
> LR's considered opinion of what a well-dressed bibliographical
> ODD should wear. I suspect that trying to formalize this into the
> TEI core is going to run into problems.
> I'd rather you said
> <include href="http://www.example.com/oddpatterns/dariah_bibl_cristal.odd"/>
> to make it explicit that it is, basically, a _view_ of the TEI.
> Sebastian Rahtz
> (acting) Information and Support Group Manager
> Oxford University Computing Services
> 13 Banbury Road, Oxford OX2 6NN. Phone +44 1865 283431
> Sólo le pido a Dios
> que el futuro no me sea indiferente
> tei-council mailing list
> tei-council at lists.village.Virginia.EDU
More information about the tei-council