[tei-council] <said> proposals available

[Lou Burnard]

Christian Wittern wrote:
>
> I think this is the crucial point in the whole proposal.  Not clearing 
> up the muddy semantics of all three elements (said, q and quote) while 
> introducing a new one would be a mistake, I think, especially in light 
> of the frequency this is debated on TEI-L.

I am afraid that this is an inherently muddy topic...
> So I will go with the new proposal which modifies <q>.

I assume by this you are expressing the same preference as I am?

> One question that will need to be considered is which of these will go 
> into TEI Lite?  Is it only <q>?  And will <cit> now also allow <q>?
>
TEI Lite currently has both <q> and <quote>, and this has silenced 
several critics of it, so I am reluctant to change it. <cit> should also 
allow <q>, however.

> Was there anything about <hi> in the proposal?  If yes, I missed it.
>
No. Should there be?