[tei-council] <said> proposals available

Laurent Romary laurent.romary at loria.fr
Mon Jul 16 05:08:30 EDT 2007


Dear all,
I would also support to keep <q> in <cit> whatever happens for the  
rest of the proposal. I feel a bit like Lou on the issue of <said>,  
i.e. not highly enthousiastic...
Best,
Laurent

Le 16 juil. 07 à 11:00, Lou Burnard a écrit :

> Christian Wittern wrote:
>>
>> I think this is the crucial point in the whole proposal.  Not  
>> clearing up the muddy semantics of all three elements (said, q and  
>> quote) while introducing a new one would be a mistake, I think,  
>> especially in light of the frequency this is debated on TEI-L.
>
> I am afraid that this is an inherently muddy topic...
>> So I will go with the new proposal which modifies <q>.
>
> I assume by this you are expressing the same preference as I am?
>
>> One question that will need to be considered is which of these  
>> will go into TEI Lite?  Is it only <q>?  And will <cit> now also  
>> allow <q>?
>>
> TEI Lite currently has both <q> and <quote>, and this has silenced  
> several critics of it, so I am reluctant to change it. <cit> should  
> also allow <q>, however.
>
>> Was there anything about <hi> in the proposal?  If yes, I missed it.
>>
> No. Should there be?
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> tei-council mailing list
> tei-council at lists.village.Virginia.EDU
> http://lists.village.Virginia.EDU/mailman/listinfo/tei-council




More information about the tei-council mailing list