[tei-council] New discussion document on 1.0 release priorities
James.Cummings at computing-services.oxford.ac.uk
Fri Jul 21 06:38:53 EDT 2006
Sebastian Rahtz wrote:
> James Cummings wrote:
(surely you should just use the unicode character?)
> yes, because of the <equiv> mechanism
Yes, certainly something I need to read up more on, that equiv element. I'm
assuming good examples of its use should be added to the
>> Your levels do mean that if I delete the TEI
>> namespace from the TEI element in a document instance, and so it is
>> also no
>> longer validated by my schema, that I instantly jump from level 0 to
>> level 5.
> which is correct, isn't it?
Yes, I suppose it is. The use of these levels increase the importance of the
need to be able indicate what schema and ODD a document instance validates against.
Dr James Cummings, Oxford Text Archive, University of Oxford
James dot Cummings at oucs dot ox dot ac dot uk
More information about the tei-council