[tei-council] New discussion document on 1.0 release priorities

Sebastian Rahtz sebastian.rahtz at oucs.ox.ac.uk
Fri Jul 21 06:03:10 EDT 2006

James Cummings wrote:
> (So why have you started this list with level0 instead of level1... just
> curious. ;-) )
> I suppose this would make it clear how much TEI your document is... I'm assuming
> (as I think you have done above) that having an ODD-derived schema is 'better'
> than just using TEI element names.
yes, because of the <equiv> mechanism
>   Your levels do mean that if I delete the TEI
> namespace from the TEI element in a document instance, and so it is also no
> longer validated by my schema, that I instantly jump from level 0 to level 5.
which is correct, isn't it?

Sebastian Rahtz      

Information Manager, Oxford University Computing Services
13 Banbury Road, Oxford OX2 6NN. Phone +44 1865 283431

OSS Watch: JISC Open Source Advisory Service

More information about the tei-council mailing list