[tei-council] New discussion document on 1.0 release priorities

[Sebastian Rahtz]

James Cummings wrote:
>
> (So why have you started this list with level0 instead of level1... just
> curious. ;-) )
>   
touché
> I suppose this would make it clear how much TEI your document is... I'm assuming
> (as I think you have done above) that having an ODD-derived schema is 'better'
> than just using TEI element names.
yes, because of the <equiv> mechanism
>   Your levels do mean that if I delete the TEI
> namespace from the TEI element in a document instance, and so it is also no
> longer validated by my schema, that I instantly jump from level 0 to level 5.
>   
which is correct, isn't it?



-- 
Sebastian Rahtz      

Information Manager, Oxford University Computing Services
13 Banbury Road, Oxford OX2 6NN. Phone +44 1865 283431

OSS Watch: JISC Open Source Advisory Service
http://www.oss-watch.ac.uk