[tei-council] TEI model classes future directions
Sebastian Rahtz
sebastian.rahtz at oucs.ox.ac.uk
Wed May 24 04:54:07 EDT 2006
Syd Bauman wrote:
> By this I take it to mean the extended class system would break the
> capability to write extensions directly in RelaxNG, rather than in
> ODD.
no, you can still write them. but if you do so,
you have to have a little understanding
of what you are doing. What you cannot
do in Relax is take
model.foo.seq = a, b, c
and extend it to add "d" on the end
> How about DTDs?
same thing. If you say
x.model.foo.seq = a |
you get a weird result. this simply needs documenting.
> XSD?
>
I have never understood how to write extensions
natively in XSD anyway, so no comment!
I am glad to see your jet lag is being so productive...
--
Sebastian Rahtz
Information Manager, Oxford University Computing Services
13 Banbury Road, Oxford OX2 6NN. Phone +44 1865 283431
OSS Watch: JISC Open Source Advisory Service
http://www.oss-watch.ac.uk
More information about the tei-council
mailing list