[tei-council] TEI model classes future directions
Syd_Bauman at Brown.edu
Wed May 24 04:45:10 EDT 2006
> There are two downsides:
> a) in RELAXNG, it is idiomatic to say
> model.foo |= bar
> to extend model.foo with the bar element as an alternate.
> Obviously if you say model.foo.sequence | = bar you end up
> a, b, c | bar
> which is not what you meant :-}
> Answer: our class models are not RELAXNG patterns which are
By this I take it to mean the extended class system would break the
capability to write extensions directly in RelaxNG, rather than in
ODD. How about DTDs? XSD?
Now I *really* have to get to bed.
More information about the tei-council