[tei-council] P5, roma and bibl[Item|Struct]

[Lou Burnard]

The problem is that Sebastian's files won't reflect any changes made to 
CVS after he left. Which is why I am being a bit careful about just 
uploading them all without checking. Since there are a lot of them, this 
takes time...

Christian Wittern wrote:
> Lou Burnard <lou.burnard at computing-services.oxford.ac.uk> writes:
> 
> 
>>Christian Wittern wrote:
>>
>>>I now went back to the non-patched version of the TEI SF tree and
>>>grepped through the Source directories, this indeed turned up both
>>>references to biblStruct and biblItem in CO/ (and possibly
>>>elsewhere).   I wonder why we do have <biblItem> in here and why it
>>>seems to be more priviliged than <biblStruct>? 
>>
>>This is very odd. Syd did remove biblStruct from the CVS tree, but I
>>thought I had prevailed on him to put it  back. Certainly it seems to
>>be there now (I just did a CVS update to check). Can you confirm that
>>there is a line declaring it in your copy of P5/fileents.dtd ?
> 
> 
> OK, now I understand.  The file in CVS (1.7) is dated 4/21 (on my
> system), the one in Sebastians "patch" 4/7 and probably older.  What a
> mess.  Here is the relevant part of the Changelog:
> ----------------------------
> revision 1.7
> date: 2005/04/15 15:30:45;  author: sbauman;  state: Exp;  lines: +13 -10
> Re-instate <biblStruct>.
> ----------------------------
> revision 1.6
> date: 2005/04/11 16:41:30;  author: louburnard;  state: Exp;  lines: +1 -0
> SPQR's changes from Dili
> 
> What I do not understand is why there is still a biblitem even in the
> latest version? And what about references to these things in the other
> files?
> 
> Well, I'll just give it another try.
> 
> All the best,
> 
> Christian
> 
>