[tei-council] P5, roma and bibl[Item|Struct]

[Christian Wittern]

Lou Burnard <lou.burnard at computing-services.oxford.ac.uk> writes:

> Christian Wittern wrote:
>> I now went back to the non-patched version of the TEI SF tree and
>> grepped through the Source directories, this indeed turned up both
>> references to biblStruct and biblItem in CO/ (and possibly
>> elsewhere).   I wonder why we do have <biblItem> in here and why it
>> seems to be more priviliged than <biblStruct>? 
>
> This is very odd. Syd did remove biblStruct from the CVS tree, but I
> thought I had prevailed on him to put it  back. Certainly it seems to
> be there now (I just did a CVS update to check). Can you confirm that
> there is a line declaring it in your copy of P5/fileents.dtd ?

OK, now I understand.  The file in CVS (1.7) is dated 4/21 (on my
system), the one in Sebastians "patch" 4/7 and probably older.  What a
mess.  Here is the relevant part of the Changelog:
----------------------------
revision 1.7
date: 2005/04/15 15:30:45;  author: sbauman;  state: Exp;  lines: +13 -10
Re-instate <biblStruct>.
----------------------------
revision 1.6
date: 2005/04/11 16:41:30;  author: louburnard;  state: Exp;  lines: +1 -0
SPQR's changes from Dili

What I do not understand is why there is still a biblitem even in the
latest version? And what about references to these things in the other
files?

Well, I'll just give it another try.

All the best,

Christian


-- 

 Christian Wittern 
 Institute for Research in Humanities, Kyoto University
 47 Higashiogura-cho, Kitashirakawa, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8265, JAPAN