[tei-council] xml-colon-thing

[Sebastian Rahtz]

Lou Burnard wrote:

>
> I am now reasonably persuaded that it is possible to make good 
> arguments for going to both xml:id and xml:lang without further ado. 
> Drafts need to be produced for the relevant pieces of P5 as soon as 
> possible, so that Council may review them. It is one thing to agree in 
> principle to an idea as sketched out e.g. in David's summary of the 
> issues, but quite another to agree to its full ramifications when 
> presented in Guidelines-style prose with examples and justifications.

Do we have the final proposal on what pointers should look like? is 
SOW-09 it? as I understand it,
<xref> and <xptr> vanish, and the "target" attribute of <ref> and <ptr> 
points to a URL. Correct?

And I assume this is part and parcel of the change to xml:id, or do we 
do them separately?

-- 
Sebastian Rahtz      
Information Manager, Oxford University Computing Services
13 Banbury Road, Oxford OX2 6NN. Phone +44 1865 283431

OSS Watch: JISC Open Source Advisory Service
http://www.oss-watch.ac.uk