Rich Tieger writes:
> IF the laws of physics as we know them hold true, and the
> big bang/big crunch theory is true, then the ER must be true.
The evidence for the big-crunch is extremely sparse... indeed, just
the sort of spiderweb of "evidence" that Saint Tipler might use to
snatch at Aquino's laurels. Cosmology, particularly mathematical
eschatology, is still almost purely and entirely a thing of fads,
not evidence. My own fad is Dyson and Linde.
The eternal recurrence is a neurological phenomenon, and is
exquisitely bound up with physics, but it is the physics of
neurophysiology that we need to examine, not the physics of
Alpha and Omega.
-- Eric Watt Forste ++ arkuat@pobox.com ++ expectation foils perception -pcd
--- from list nietzsche@lists.village.virginia.edu ---