Re: [adhoc] guidance to ECs, meeting in Victoria

This all sounds good to me--having the opportunity to review
membership information before the meeting seems logical, since the
meeting is the best opportunity we have to make adjustments to the
representation on the steering committee.

Best wishes, Julia

At 1:50 PM -0500 6/1/05, John Unsworth wrote:
>Folks,
>
>I'm still hoping for some discussion (or simply endorsement) of the
>proposition that we recommend to both ALLC and ACH executives, with
>respect to the two questions posted at the top of the revised
>governance protocol, as follows:
>
>1) We recommend that the SC should review best available membership
>information from the past year (e.g., December figures from OUP)
>before the annual meeting, and then let each executive committee
>know how many steering committee members they can appoint, when they
>meet at the conference.
>
>2. We recommend that a sentence be inserted in II.7 of the
>governance protocol, referencing the conference protocol and annex
>for specific rights and responsibilities of the Conference
>Coordinating Committee.
>
>Also, assuming we get membership information in the next day or two
>and are able to follow the advice in #1, above, in the present case,
>I'd like to propose that new and continuing SC members meet at the
>back of the lecture hall after Ann Balsamo's opening plenary, and
>adjourn from there to Felicitas, in the Student Union building, to
>hold our first meeting of the 2005-2006 year. Voting members,
>please let me know if that is unworkable for any of you. Others on
>this list are also welcome.
>
>John
>_______________________________________________
>adhoc mailing list
>adhoc_at_lists.village.Virginia.EDU
>http://lists.village.Virginia.EDU/mailman/listinfo/adhoc

_______________________________________________
adhoc mailing list
adhoc_at_lists.village.Virginia.EDU
http://lists.village.Virginia.EDU/mailman/listinfo/adhoc
Received on Wed Jun 01 2005 - 16:06:20 EDT