[tei-council] Preparation for F2F meeting

[Peter Stadler]

Am 16.11.2014 um 10:53 schrieb lou <lou.burnard at retired.ox.ac.uk>:

> We'll discuss this later, but I think it might be helpful to specify 
> more exactly the scope of the proposed validation service. Does it give 
> the punter anything beyond what they can readily get by running jing (or 
> whatever) for themselves?

My primarily intended users are not those with oXygen installed or those running jing on the command line (or whathaveyou). But 
a) those with no knowledge about TEI (e.g. decision maker, funding bodies)
b) machines

Having an 'advanced‘ validation service with detailed reports for the knowing is definitely something to pursuit (but we didn’t take the first step yet)

Best
Peter
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 455 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
Url : http://lists.village.Virginia.EDU/pipermail/tei-council/attachments/20141116/be7bee65/attachment.bin