[tei-council] addition of <availability>

[James Cummings]

On 09/09/14 16:53, Martin Holmes wrote:
> Having re-read the ticket, I'm not sure about that. It would mean that
> <availability> is not available anywhere in <biblStruct>. Council
> already agreed that it should be in <analytic>, <series> and <monogr>.
> Elli decided also to put it in <edition>, but I think we could roll that
> one back on the basis that we haven't had a chance to discuss it, and it
> may not be necessary given the other locations it will be available.

Seems reasonable.

> I find that quite convincing, so I vote for <availability> as a child of
> <imprint> and not a direct child of <monogr> (since a <monogr> must
> always have an <imprint>).
>
> What do you all think?

+1

-James

>
> Cheers,
> Martin
>
>>
>>
>>> Anything to do with <biblStruct> is always thorny. But I think one
>>> thing we should probably not do is to introduce an element in a new
>>> place only to remove it in a subsequent release after more debate.
>>> So it might be prudent to remove any remotely controversial changes
>>> from this release, and open up the ticket again for us to deal with
>>> at the face-to-face.
>>>
>>> On the other hand, you might just want to allow it everywhere
>>> anyone wants it, put that in the release and walk away with relief
>>> from a fait accompli. :-)


-- 
Dr James Cummings, James.Cummings at it.ox.ac.uk
Academic IT Services, University of Oxford