[tei-council] List @type musings
Martin Holmes
mholmes at uvic.ca
Mon Aug 4 18:28:26 EDT 2014
On 14-08-04 03:03 PM, Paul Schaffner wrote:
>
> I find it hard to locate examples that are succinct and not laden
> with other complications. A sampler of less succinct and simple
> examples follows below. I also included an example of one of the
> commonest uses of list in our books, namely the analytical outline
> of a book, or of a given topic as explored by a given book.
> (@type="analysis"
> or "outline") BTW I had meant all this as a kind of theoretical musing
> on what it means to be a kind or type of list, hence the frivolous
> off-the-cuff examples in the original message. pfs
Actually, I liked the two examples I used (one with a tweak) because
they were simple and easy to understand. Could people t ake a look at
the list page as it now stands, and see if they would rather see the
richer examples below substitute for the simpler ones?
As Sebastian says, he seems to have conquered the problem of overriding
a global attribute at the element level. Do we want to keep the values
for @rend as specified now in the <list> spec, or shall we stick with
presenting those values only in the chapter prose? I'm easy either way.
We could do both, but that seems like overkill.
Cheers,
Martin
>
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 4, 2014, at 14:46, Martin Holmes wrote:
>> I've now added "index", "instructions", "litany" and "syllogism" to the
>> suggested value list for list/@type, along with a couple of examples
>> from his post. I think this provides a more helpful set of examples from
>> which it's much clearer what the purpose of @type is, in contrast with
>> @rend.
>>
>> After it's finished building in an hour or so, take a look here:
>>
>> <http://teijenkins.hcmc.uvic.ca/job/TEIP5/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/release/doc/tei-p5-doc/en/html/ref-list.html>
>>
>> and see if it looks OK.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Martin
>>
>> On 14-08-02 04:10 AM, Sebastian Rahtz wrote:
>>> Paul, I think some litany and syllogism examples from actual
>>> texts would be great additions to the guidelines. I assume your
>>> examples here are made up?
>>>
>>> I agree that putting in some of these values really helps
>>> to make the point about what @type is for.
>>> --
>>> Sebastian Rahtz
>>> Director (Research) of Academic IT
>>> University of Oxford IT Services
>>> 13 Banbury Road, Oxford OX2 6NN. Phone +44 1865 283431
>>>
>>> Não sou nada.
>>> Nunca serei nada.
>>> Não posso querer ser nada.
>>> À parte isso, tenho em mim todos os sonhos do mundo.
>>>
>> --
>> tei-council mailing list
>> tei-council at lists.village.Virginia.EDU
>> http://lists.village.Virginia.EDU/mailman/listinfo/tei-council
>>
>> PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived
>
> --------- ATTACHED EXAMPLES ----------
>
> Some additional @types of <list> might be
> "outline," "analogy," "creed," "anagram," or "roster."
> Some features to which TEI has given their own
> elements might also be regarded as specialized @types
> of <list>, e.g. <list type="dramatis_personae">
>
>
> Examples
>
> 1. ANAGRAM
>
> http://name.umdl.umich.edu/A18243.0001.001
> http://wwwlib.umi.com/eebo/image/25221/13
>
> <list type="anagram">
> <head>Anagram</head>
> <item>THOMA BOWES</item>
> <item>Beatus Homo.</item>
> </item>
>
> 2. SYLLOGISM
>
>
> http://name.umdl.umich.edu/A03915.0001.001
> http://wwwlib.umi.com/eebo/image/4537/1
>
> <p>A Short Treatise of the Crosse in Baptisme, contracted into this
> Syllogisme.
> <list type="syllogism">
> <item>No humane ordinance becomming an Idoll may lawfully be vsed in the
> service of God.</item>
> <item>But the signe of the Crosse, being an humane ordinance is become
> an Idoll.</item>
> <item><hi>Ergo:</hi> The signe of the Crosse, may not lawfully bee vsed
> in the service of God.</item>
> </list></p>
>
>
>
> http://name.umdl.umich.edu/A04827.0001.001
> http://wwwlib.umi.com/eebo/image/8467/21
>
> <p>The reason is thus made:
> <list type="syllogism">
> <item>The same thing is not the cause and the effect.</item>
> <item>But the loue of God is the effect of reconciliation.</item>
> <item>Therefore it is not the cause of it.</item>
> </list></p>
>
>
> http://name.umdl.umich.edu/A05111.0001.001
> http://wwwlib.umi.com/eebo/image/8364/42
> Title: The Logic of Peter Ramus
>
> <p>The first sorte then of this kynde is, when the argument goyng before
> in the
> proposition sometyme affirmatiuely and somtyme negatiuely, and in the
> assumption only affirmatiuely inferethe a speciall conclusion: as, in
> the examples followyng.</p>
> <list type="syllogism">
> <head>Affirmant generall, as.</head>
> <item>Constancie is a vertue:</item>
> <item>But Constancie is Confidence:</item>
> <item>Therfore some Confidence is vertue.</item>
> </list>
> <list type="syllogism">
> <head>Negant generall, as:</head>
> <item>Folyshehardines is no vertue:</item>
> <item>But folyshehardines is Confidence:</item>
> <item>Some Confidence therfore is no vertue.</item>
> </list>
> <list type="syllogism">
> <head>Affirmant speciall, as,</head>
> <item>A wyseman is to be praysed:</item>
> <item>But some wyseman is a poore man:</item>
> <item>Therfore some poore man is to be praysed.</item>
> </list>
> <list type="syllogism">
> <head>Negant speciall, as:</head>
> <item>A foole is not alwayes happye:</item>
> <item>But some foole is fortunate:</item>
> <item>Therfore some fortunate is not alwayes happye.</item>
> </list>
> <list type="syllogism">
> <head>Affirmant proper: as,</head>
> <item>Socrates is a Philosopher:</item>
> <item>But Soceates is a man:</item>
> <item>Therfore some man is a Philosopher.</item>
> </list>
> <list type="syllogism">
> <head>Negant proper, as.</head>
> <item>Thersites is no Philosopher:</item>
> <item><pb n="84" ref="43">But Thersites is a man,</item>
> <item>Some man therfore is no Philosopher.</item>
> </list>
>
>
> http://name.umdl.umich.edu/A94223.0001.001
> http://wwwlib.umi.com/eebo/image/150264/6
>
> <p>...I thus proceed to prove the possibility of it, which was the
> second thing propos'd:
> <list type="syllogism">
> <item>All that which is not a Chymerical Fiction is possible.</item>
> <item>This Object is no Chymerical Fiction.</item>
> <item>Therefore this Object is possible.</item>
> </list>
> Nothing can be here deny'd but the <hi>minor</hi> or second Proposition,
> which I thus prove:
> <pb n="5">
> <list type="syllogism">
> <item>A Chymerical Fiction hath a great Defect, to wit, its
> impossibility to exist.</item>
> <item>This Object hath no Defect.</item>
> <item>Therefore this Object is possible.</item>
> </list>
> </p>
>
>
>
>
>
> http://name.umdl.umich.edu/A07407.0001.001
> http://wwwlib.umi.com/eebo/image/4450/79
>
> <list type="syllogism">
> <head>An other argument.</head>
> <item>By Grace we are iust.</item>
> <item>Grace is a loue poured into our mind<expan>is</expan></item>
> <item>Ergo. By loue we are iust.</item>
> </list>
>
>
> 2B. SYLLOGISM with the traditional syllogism-type specified (barbara,
> darij, etc.)
>
>
> http://name.umdl.umich.edu/A09891.0001.001
> http://wwwlib.umi.com/eebo/image/5421/25
>
> <head>Arg 6. A Causis. 18</head>
> <list type="syllogism">
> <item><label>Bar-</label> Of what thing so ever the causes are evill
> that thing it selfe is evill.</item>
> <item><label>-ba-</label> Vsurie is a thing whose causes are evill; as
> is declared before. Cap. 2. Posit. 2. &c.</item>
> <item><label>-ra</label> <hi>Ergo,</hi> Vsurie it selfe is
> evill.</item>
> </list>
> <list type="syllogism">
> <head>Arg 7. Ab Effectis. 19 </head>
> <item><label>Bar-</label> That thing whose effects are evill, is also
> evill.</item>
> <item><label>-ba-</label> Vsurie is such a thing, as is proved Cap. 6.
> Posit. 2.</item>
> <item><label>-ra</label> <hi>Ergo,</hi> Vsurie is evill.</item>
> </list>
>
>
> 2C SYLLOGISM with the premises labeled (major, minor, conclusion)
>
> http://name.umdl.umich.edu/A17267.0001.001
> http://wwwlib.umi.com/eebo/image/7446/32
>
> <list type="syllogism">
> <head>Syllogis. 2.</head>
> <item><label>Maior:</label> That which the <hi>Publique Catechisme</hi>
> conteyned in our booke of Common prayer, and which the <hi>Articles of
> Religion</hi> concluded in 1562. teach, is to be acknowledged for the
> Doctrine of our Church.</item>
> <item><label>Minor.</label> But both our <hi>Catechisme,</hi> and those
> Articles doe teach thus much:</item>
> <item><label>Conclus:</label> Therefore this Position is agreeable to
> the Doctrine of our Church.</item>
> </list>
>
>
> 2C. type=SYLLOGISM combined with gloss list.
>
>
> http://name.umdl.umich.edu/A00630.0001.001
> http://wwwlib.umi.com/eebo/image/27709/12
>
> <div>
> <list type="gloss">
> <label>The firste proper.</label>
> <item>
> <list type="syllogism">
> <item>Iudas Iscariote was not the seruaunt of Christ:</item>
> <item>Iudas the brother of Iames was the true seruant of Christ,</item>
> <item>Therfore Iudas Iscariot was not the brother of Iames.</item>
> </list>
> </item>
> <label>The second proper.</label>
> <item>
> <list type="syllogism">
> <item>Timothie was an Euangeliste:</item>
> <item>Paule was not an Euangeliste: Therefore</item>
> <item>Timothy was not Paule.</item>
> </list>
> </item>
> </list>
> </div>
>
> <div>
> <head>Of the 2. sorte, Of a lesse playne Sillogisme or more fullie
> expressed.</head>
> <p>In the seconde kinde, the reason founde out goeth before in the
> proposition, and followeth in the assumption affirmatiuelie:</p>
>
> <list type="gloss">
> <label>The generall affirmatiue.</label>
> <item>
> <list type="syllogism">
> <item>Euerie sinner is subiecte to condemnation.</item>
> <item>Euerie man is a sinner: Therefore</item>
> <item>Enery man is subiect to condemnation.</item>
> </list>
> </item>
> <label>The generall negatiue.</label>
> <item>
> <list type="syllogism">
> <item>No sinner is iustified by his workes:</item>
> <item>Euerie man is a sinner, Therefore</item>
> <item>No man is iustified by his workes.</item>
> </list>
> </item>
> <label>The speciall affirmatiue.</label>
> <item>
> <list type="syllogism">
> <item>Euery Apostle must preache the Gospell:</item>
> <item>Paule is an Apostle: Therefore</item>
> <item>Paule must preache the Gospell.</item>
> </list>
> </item>
> <label>The speciall negatiue.</label>
> <item>
> <list type="syllogism">
> <item>No dissembler was euer approued of God:</item>
> <item>Ananias was a dissembler: Therefore</item>
> <item>Ananias was neuer approued of God.</item>
> </list>
> </item>
> <label>The proper affirmatiue.</label>
> <item>
> <list type="syllogism">
> <item>The Sonne of God is the true Messias:</item>
> <item>I am the Sonne of God: Therefore</item>
> <item>I am the true Messias.</item>
> </list>
> </item>
> <label>The proper negatiue.</label>
> <item>
> <list type="syllogism">
> <item>Iohn did not denie Christe:</item>
> <item>This Euangelist is Iohn: Therefore</item>
> <item>This Euangeliste did not denie Christe.</item>
> </list>
> </item>
> </list>
> <trailer>Thus much of the simple Sillogisme.</trailer>
> </div>
>
>
>
>
> 3. type=KEY (to a diagram or map or illustration--list within <figure>)
>
> http://name.umdl.umich.edu/A29092.0001.001
> http://wwwlib.umi.com/eebo/image/56409/2
>
> <p>
> <figure><figdesc>crime-scene diagram with compass rose, measurements and
> marked locations</figdesc>
> <p><list type="key">
> <item><hi>B.</hi> the Bed</item>
> <item><hi>R</hi> where ye razor was pretended to be found.</item>
> <item>cl: w. ye Closset window.</item>
> <item>st ye Close. Stole.</item>
> <item><hi>E.</hi> ye bloody foot on my Lords. Stockin.</item>
> <item>c. ye only Chink of ye Closset door.</item>
> <item>ch ye Chimney.</item>
> <item>c: w. ye Chamber window out of which ye razor was thrown.</item>
> <item><hi>C: D</hi> ye Chamber door.</item>
> <item><hi>E:</hi> the Earl of Essex as he was first found by those y^t.
> saw the body before it was pretended to be moued.</item>
> </list></p>
> </figure>
> </p>
>
>
> 4. LITANY
>
> http://name.umdl.umich.edu/A84657.0001.001
> http://wwwlib.umi.com/eebo/image/150050/63
>
> <list type="litany">
> <head><hi>IESVS MARIA.</hi> Litaniae dicendae pro conversione Anglia ad
> Religionem Catholicam.</head>
> <item>KYRIE eleïson. Christe eleïson.</item>
> <item>Kyrie eleïson. Christe audi nos.</item>
> <item>Christe exaudi nos.</item>
> <item>Pater de coelis Deus, Miserere nobis.</item>
> <item>Fili Redemptor mundi Deus, miserere nobis.</item>
> <item>Spiritus sancte Deus, miserere nobis.</item>
> <item>Sancta Trinitas unus Deus, Miserere nobis.</item>
> <item>Sancta Maria, Ora pro nobis</item>
> <item>Sancta Dei genitrix, ora &c.</item>
> <item>Sancta Virgo Virginum, ora.</item>
> <item>Sancte Michaël, ora.</item>
> <item>Sancte Gabriël, ora.</item>
> <item>Sancte Raphaël, ora.</item>
> <item>Omnes sancti Angeli & Archangeli, orate.</item>
> <item>Omnes sacti beatorum spirituum ordines, orate &c.</item>
> <item>Sancte Joannes Baptista, ora.</item>
> <item>Sancte Joseph, ora.</item>
> <item>Omnes sancti Patriarchae & Prophetae, orate.</item>
> <item>S. Petre. ora.</item>
> <item>S. Paule, ora.</item>
> <item>S. Andrea, ora.</item>
> <item>S. Jacobe, ora.</item>
> <item>S. Joannes, ora.</item>
> <item>S. Thoma, ora.</item>
> <item>S. Jacobe, ora.</item>
> <item>S. Philippe, ora.</item>
> <item>S. Bartholomaee, ora.</item>
> <item>S. Mathaee, ora.</item>
> <item>S. Simon, ora.</item>
> <item>S. Thadaee, ora.</item>
> * * *
> </list>
>
>
>
> 5. type=ANALOGY
>
> http://name.umdl.umich.edu/A56521.0001.001
> http://wwwlib.umi.com/eebo/image/108157/7
>
>
>
>
> <p>IN Multiplication the Analogie is this;
> <list type="analogy">
> <item>As 1 is to one of the numbers given, to be multiplyed
> together:</item>
> <item>So is the other of them, to the Product.</item>
> </list></p>
> <p>Wherefore it may be &s;aid,
> <list type="analogy">
> <item>As 1 is to the Multiplicator;</item>
> <item>So is the Multiplicand to the Product.</item>
> </list> Or,
> <list type="analogy">
> <item>As 1 is to the Multiplicand;</item>
> <item>So is the Mul|tiplicator, to the Product.</item>
> </list></p>
>
>
>
> 6. type="OUTLINE" (or "ANALYSIS")
>
>
> http://name.umdl.umich.edu/A34051.0001.001
> http://wwwlib.umi.com/eebo/image/46235/177
>
>
>
> <HEAD>An Analytical Table of all the Weekly and Fe&s;tival
> Collects.</HEAD>
> <p>§. 2. In them we pray either first for our selves, or secondly
> for others;
> <p>In the first sort we pray for our selves,
> <list type="outline">
> <item>1. For both body and soul, 2. and 5. of Lent.</item>
> <item>2. For the body and things temporal,
> <list>
> <item>1. Safety by the
> <list>
> <item>Providence of God, 2, 3, 4, & 20. after Trin.</item>
> <item>Guarding of Angels, St. Michael.</item>
> </list>
> </item>
> <item>2. Deliverance from
> <list>
> <item>Enemies, 3. Lent.</item>
> <item>Judgments, Sexagessima, Septuag. 4. Lent.</item>
> </list>
> </item>
> <item>3. Support in Adversity, 3, 4. Epiphany.</item>
> <item>4. Both Preservation from evil and supply of good. 8. 15.
> Trinity.</item>
> </list>
> </item>
> <item>3. For the soul and things spiritual,
> <list>
> <item>1. Manifold gifts from God, St. Barnabas.</item>
> <item>2. Especial favours of God,
> <list>
> <item>1. Pardon of sin, 12.21 & 24. Trinity.</item>
> <item>2. Benefit of Christs death, Annuntiation.</item>
> <item>3. Acceptance for his sake Purification. 2. Epiphany.</item>
> <item>3. Abundant Grace as to
> <list>
> <item>1. The Author of it
> <list>
> <item>1. To comfort us, Sund. after Ascens.</item>
> <item>2. To inlighten us, Whitsunday.</item>
> <item>3. To direct us, 19. Trinity.</item>
> </list>
> </item>
> <item>2. The means in
> <list>
> <item>1. Hearing. St. Bartholomew. St. Luke.</item>
> <item>2. Reading, 2. Advent.</item>
> <item>3. Falling, 1. Lent.</item>
> <item>4. Prayer. 10. & 23. Trinity.</item>
> </list>
> </item>
> <item>3. The end to
> <list>
> <item>1. Convert us from sin, 1. Advent. 1. Easter. St. Andrew.
> St. James. St. Matthew.</item>
> <item>2. Rescue us in temptations, 4. Advent. 4. Epiphany. 18.
> Trinity.</item>
> <item>3. Enable us to do good, 5. Easter. 1. & 9. Trinity.
> 11. 13. Trinity. 17. 25. Trinity.</item>
> <item>4. Bring us to glory, Epiphany. 6. after
> Epiphany.</item>
> </list>
> </item>
> <item>4. The kinds of it, for
> <list>
> <item>1. Regeneration Nativity of Christ.</item>
> <item>2. Charity, Quinquagessima.</item>
> <item>3. Mortification, Circumcision. Easter Even.</item>
> <item>4. Contrition, Ash-Wednesday.</item>
> <item>5. Sincerity. 3. Easter.</item>
> <item>6. Love of God and his laws, 4. Easter. 6. & 14.
> Trinity.</item>
> <item>7. Heavenly affections, Ascension-day.</item>
> <item>8. Faith both
> <list>
> <item>Right Trinity Sunday.</item>
> <item>Stedfast, 7. Trinity. St. Thomas. St. Mark.</item>
> </list>
> </item>
> <item>9. Imitation of
> <list>
> <item>Christ 6. Lent. 2. Easter.</item>
> <item>The Saints St. Steven. St. Paul. St. Philip &
> Jacob St. John Baptist. Holy Innocents. All Saints
> day.</item>
> </list>
> </item>
> </list>
> </item>
> </list>
>
>
>
>
>
> 7. type="GENEALOGY"
>
> http://name.umdl.umich.edu/A70453.0001.001
> http://wwwlib.umi.com/eebo/image/55739/35
>
>
> <list type="genealogy">
> <head><hi>Malcolme</hi> III. sirnamed <hi>Cammoir,</hi> King of
> <hi>Scotland,</hi> slain 1093. -- <hi>Margaret</hi> Sister to <hi>Edgar
> Atheling.</hi></head>
> <item>
> <list type="sons">
> <item>1 <hi>Edward,</hi> eldest Son, slain with his Father,
> 1093.</item>
> <item>2 <hi>Edgar</hi> King of <hi>Scotland,</hi> died without Issue,
> 1107.</item>
> <item>3 <hi>Alexander,</hi> also King, 1107. <hi>Obiit sine
> prole,</hi> 1124.
> <list>
> <item><hi>Melcofus,</hi> a bastard. <hi>Ordericus, pag.</hi>
> 702.</item>
> </list>
> </item>
> <item>4 <hi>David,</hi> also King, 1124 <hi>Obiit</hi> 1153 --
> <hi>Maud,</hi> Daughter of <hi>Waltheof,</hi> Earl of
> <hi>Northumberland.</hi>
> <list>
> <item>1 <hi>Claricia.</hi></item>
> <item>2 <hi>Hodierna.</hi><note place="marg"><hi>Ordericus,</hi> pa.
> 702.</note></item>
> <item>Another Son, the eldest, kill'd by a Varlet in his Nurses
> arms. <hi>Ordericus, pag.</hi> 702.</item>
> <item><hi>Henry</hi> Prince of <hi>Scotland,</hi> died before his
> Father, <hi>viz. Anno</hi> 1152. -- <hi>Ada,</hi> Sister to the
> third <hi>William</hi> Earl <hi>Warren</hi> and <hi>Surrey,</hi>
> 1139.
> <list>
> <item><hi>Margaret,</hi> married to <hi>Conan</hi> Earl of
> <hi>Little-Brettain;</hi> after to <hi>Bohuis.</hi> She died 1201.
> <hi>Hoveden,</hi> p. 822.</item>
> <item>1 <hi>Malcolme</hi> IV. <hi>Obiit sine prole,</hi>
> 1165.</item>
> <item>2 <hi>William</hi> King of <hi>Scotland,</hi> died 1214. --
> <hi>Ermengard,</hi> Daughter of <hi>Richard</hi> Viscount
> <hi>Beaumont,</hi> 1186.
> <list>
> <item>2 <hi>Henry.</hi>
> <list>
> <item><hi>Patrick de Galightly,</hi> one of the
> Competitors.</item>
> </list>
> </item>
> <item>1 <hi>Alexander</hi> II. King of <hi>Scotland. Obiit</hi>
> 1249. -- <hi>Joan,</hi> Sister to <hi>H</hi> 3. King of
> <hi>England,</hi> 1221.
> <list>
> <item><hi>Alexander</hi> III. King of <hi>Scotland,</hi>
> killed by a fall from his Horse, <hi>A.</hi> 1285. --
> <hi>Margaret,</hi> Daughter of <hi>Hen.</hi> 3. King of
> <hi>England,</hi> 1251.
> <list>
> <item><hi>David</hi> Son of <hi>Alexander</hi> III. died
> before his Father without Issue.</item>
> <item><hi>Alexander</hi> married the Daughter of the
> Earl of <hi>Flanders;</hi> but he died before his
> Father, leaving no Issue.</item>
> <item><hi>Margaret</hi> Wife of the King of
> <hi>Norwey.</hi>
> <list>
> <item><hi>Margaret,</hi> a Daughter, died young,
> without Issue, about 1291.<note
> place="marg"><hi>Ericus</hi> King of <hi>Norwey</hi>
> became a Competitor for the Crown of
> <hi>Scotland,</hi> on behalf of <hi>Margaret</hi> his
> Daughter, now deceased, as Administrator to her,
> <hi>Anno</hi> 1292. <hi>Walsingham</hi>'s
> <hi>Hist.</hi> pag. 58.</note></item>
> </list>
> </item>
> </list>
> </item>
> </list>
> </item>
> <item><hi>Isabel,</hi> Wife of <hi>Roger le Bigot</hi> Earl
> Marshal; no Issue: But she married <hi>Robert</hi> Lord
> <hi>Roos,</hi> first Hus.
> <list>
> <item><hi>William</hi> L. <hi>Roos,</hi> another
> Competitor.</item>
> </list>
> </item>
> <item><hi>Margaret</hi> Wife of <hi>Hubert de Burgo</hi> Earl
> of <hi>Kent,</hi> 1221. <hi>M. Paris.</hi>
> <list>
> <item><hi>Margaret</hi> Wife of <hi>Richard de Clare:</hi>
> No Issue.</item>
> </list>
> </item>
> <item><hi>Margerita</hi> Wife unto <hi>Eustace de Vescy</hi>
> <list>
> <item><hi>William de Vescy</hi>
> <list>
> <item>1 <hi>John sine prole.</hi></item>
> <item>2 <hi>William Vescy,</hi> another
> Competitor. 1291.</item>
> </list>
> </item>
> </list>
> </item>
> <item><hi>Ada,</hi> Wife of <hi>Patrick de Dunbarre.</hi> --
> <hi>Patrick.</hi>
> <list>
> <item><hi>Patric</hi> E. of <hi>Dunbar,</hi> another
> Competitor. 1291.</item>
> </list>
> </item>
> <item><hi>Austrio,</hi> or <hi>Aufrica,</hi> Wife of
> <hi>William de Say</hi> of <hi>&V;lster.</hi>
> <list>
> <item><hi>A quo Roger de Mandevil,</hi> another
> Competitor.</item>
> </list>
> </item>
> </list>
> </item>
> <item>3 <hi>David</hi> Earl of <hi>Huntington,</hi> 1184. --
> <hi>Maud,</hi> eldest Sister to <hi>Randle Blundevil</hi> Earl of
> <hi>Chester,</hi> and a Coheir.
> <list>
> <item>1 <hi>Margaret,</hi> eldest daughter of <hi>David</hi>
> Earl of <hi>Huntington,</hi> was Second wife to <hi>Alan</hi>
> de <hi>Galloway,</hi> Constable of <hi>Scotland.</hi>
> <list>
> <item><hi>Dervergoile,</hi> married to <hi>John
> Baliol</hi> of <hi>Bernards Castle</hi> in the Bishoprick
> of <hi>Durham,</hi> the Founder of <hi>Baliol-College</hi>
> in <hi>Oxford.</hi> He died <hi>Anno</hi> 1269. <hi>aut
> paulo ante.</hi>
> <list>
> <item>1 <hi>Hugh Baliol,</hi> Son and Heir. <hi>Obiit
> sine prole. Balio-fergus, pag.</hi> 2.</item>
> <item>2 <hi>Alan,</hi> second Son. <hi>Obiit sine
> prole.</hi></item>
> <item>3 <hi>Alexander,</hi> third Son. <hi>Obiit sine
> prole.</hi></item>
> <item>4 <hi>John Baliol,</hi> another Competitor, who
> was adjudged King of <hi>Scotland</hi> by the Award of
> King <hi>Edward</hi> the First, <hi>Anno</hi>
> 1292.</item>
> </list>
> </item>
> <item><hi>Thomas</hi> died without Issue.</item>
> <item><hi>Christian,</hi> eldest Daughter, died without
> Issue.</item>
> </list>
> </item>
> <item>2 <hi>Isabel</hi> married <hi>Robert de Bruse.</hi> --
> <hi>Ro. de Bruse</hi> Lord of <hi>Anandale,</hi> another
> Competitor. 1291.</item>
> <item>3 <hi>Maud</hi> died without Issue.</item>
> <item>4 <hi>Ada</hi> married <hi>Henry Hastings.</hi> <note
> place="marg"><hi>Knighton,</hi> pag. 2431.</note>
> <list>
> <item><hi>John Hastings</hi> Lord of <hi>Berguenny,</hi>
> another Competitor. 1291.</item>
> </list>
> </item>
> <item>1 <hi>Henry</hi> died young.</item>
> <item>2 <hi>David</hi> died young.</item>
> <item>3 <hi>John Scot</hi> Earl of <hi>Chester,</hi> married
> <hi>Hellen,</hi> Daughter of <hi>Lhewellyn</hi> Prince of
> <hi>North-Wales.</hi><note place="marg"><hi>John</hi> died
> without Issue, <hi>Anno</hi> 1237. <hi>Helen</hi> his Widow
> after married <hi>Robert Quency,</hi> third Son of <hi>Saher
> de Quency</hi> Earl of <hi>Winchester.</hi></note></item>
> </list>
> </item>
> <item><hi>Ada</hi> Wife of <hi>Florence</hi> Earl of
> <hi>Holland.</hi> She died 1208. <hi>Hist. of the Netherlands,
> p.</hi> 16.
> <list>
> <item><hi>Florence.</hi></item>
> <item><hi>William.</hi></item>
> <item><hi>Florence,</hi> a Competitor to the Crown of
> <hi>Scotland; An Do.</hi> 1291. <hi>Pryn</hi>'s <hi>Hist.
> p.</hi> 513.</item>
> </list>
> </item>
> </list>
> </item>
> </list>
> </item>
> <item>5 & 6 <hi>Edmund,</hi> and <hi>Ethelred,</hi> banisht by
> their Uncle <hi>Donwald.</hi></item>
> </list>
> <list type="daughters">
> <item>1 <hi>Edith,</hi> after called <hi>Maude, uxor H.</hi> 1.
> <hi>Regis Angliae.</hi></item>
> <item>2 <hi>Mary,</hi> wife of <hi>Eustace, Comitis
> Boloniae.</hi></item>
> </list>
> </item>
> </list>
>
>
More information about the tei-council
mailing list