[tei-council] @calendar and @datingMethod

Martin Holmes mholmes at uvic.ca
Wed May 21 13:18:50 EDT 2014


On 14-05-20 01:54 PM, Lou Burnard wrote:
> I've had a quick look and think this looks good, though I think it might
> make clearer that the custom-xxx attributes provide a (non-standard)
> normalized form, perhaps by complementing same with the standard
> normalised equivalent.

I've added a new para which shows the use of @when alongside 
@when-custom, to provide a Gregorian equivalent of a Julian date.

If that builds OK and looks right, I'll close the ticket.

Cheers,
Martin



>
> In the meantime I've taken on myself the other action suggested by the
> ticket -- a sweep through the <att> elements in P5 to see if there are
> any other rogues. I found about twenty <att> elements which don't
> correspond with  a TEI:attDef/@ident : the vast majority are simple
> cases where a @scheme attribute has been omitted, or where the attribute
> name has been translated into Spanish for some reason. I'll fix them up
> shortly.
>
>
>
>    On 20/05/14 18:57, Martin Holmes wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> This ticket:
>>
>> <https://sourceforge.net/p/tei/bugs/668/>
>>
>> raises the need for a proper explanation of the usage and differences
>> between @calendar and @datingMethod. I've added a short section to the
>> Names and Dates chapter to cover this:
>>
>> <http://teijenkins.hcmc.uvic.ca/job/TEIP5-Documentation/ws/Guidelines-web/en/html/ND.html#NDDATECUSTOM>
>>
>> along with a link to it from the Calendar Description section of the
>> header chapter:
>>
>> <http://teijenkins.hcmc.uvic.ca/job/TEIP5-Documentation/ws/Guidelines-web/en/html/HD.html#HD44>
>>
>> Please read through the section and see if it makes sense to you, report
>> any typos, etc.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Martin
>


More information about the tei-council mailing list