[tei-council] example validity

[Martin Holmes]

On 14-01-26 06:31 PM, James Cummings wrote:
>
> Hiya,
>
> Looking through the chapter on default text structure I noticed
> an example which was marked as not being valid.  The second
> example after:
>
> http://www.tei-c.org/release/doc/tei-p5-doc/en/html/DS.html#DSDIV3
>
> with <div> elements for morning and afternoon diary entries.
>
> Am I mis-reading it (possible, I am jetlagged)... or should that
> be completely and totally valid?

Looks completely valid to me. I think that must just be a typo. Maybe 
someone copy-pasted another example and forgot to change that bit?

Cheers,
Martin

>
> When I copy and paste it into a TEI file in my preferred editor,
> it doesn't complain about it.  In the source it is marked as
> *feasibly* valid... but I'd like to suggest that it is truly
> valid. (ok, the content of paragraphs is '....' but that doesn't
> stop its validity...)
>
> Thinking out loud.
>
> -James
>
>