[tei-council] Re : build failure

[Lou Burnard]

Apologies, this was not a bid to take over the planet, but an 
unfortunate phoneo/typo

Anyway, I've now checked in the proposed change, so we'll see if it 
makes any diff...


On 14/12/13 07:28, Lou Burnard wrote:
> World for.me!
>
> Envoyé depuis mon HTC
>
> ----- Reply message -----
> De : "Martin Holmes" <mholmes at uvic.ca>
> Pour : "tei-council at lists.village.Virginia.EDU" <tei-council at lists.village.Virginia.EDU>
> Objet : [tei-council] build failure
> Date : ven., déc. 13, 2013 22:44
>
>
>
> Shouldn't we just tag them as valid="false"? It would be technically a
> bit premature, but would have the desired effect. Alternatively we could
> add a new value for @valid -- perhaps "impermanently"?
>
> On 13-12-13 12:11 PM, Lou Burnard wrote:
>> On/12/13 19:59, Sebastian Rahtz wrote:
>>> On 13 Dec 2013, at 19:57, "Lou Burnard" <lou.burnard at retired.ox.ac.uk> wrote:
>>>> Of course when a whole element is deprecated (e.g. relationGrp) the
>>>> examples of usage *in that element spec* are not going to disappear
>>>> until the element itself does. Or are we suggesting they should?
>>> I think I suggest they should. We have decided to zap the beast, so stage one is to remove examples of its use.
>> Even from the tagdoc that describes them? that seems a bit harsh, as
>> well as falsifying the historical record. Maybe I'll just comment the
>> little suckers out.
>>
> --
> Martin Holmes
> University of Victoria Humanities Computing and Media Centre
> (mholmes at uvic.ca)
> --
> tei-council mailing list
> tei-council at lists.village.Virginia.EDU
> http://lists.village.Virginia.EDU/mailman/listinfo/tei-council
>
> PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived