[tei-council] Re : build failure

[Lou Burnard]

World for.me!

Envoyé depuis mon HTC

----- Reply message -----
De : "Martin Holmes" <mholmes at uvic.ca>
Pour : "tei-council at lists.village.Virginia.EDU" <tei-council at lists.village.Virginia.EDU>
Objet : [tei-council] build failure
Date : ven., déc. 13, 2013 22:44



Shouldn't we just tag them as valid="false"? It would be technically a
bit premature, but would have the desired effect. Alternatively we could
add a new value for @valid -- perhaps "impermanently"?

On 13-12-13 12:11 PM, Lou Burnard wrote:
> On 13/12/13 19:59, Sebastian Rahtz wrote:
>> On 13 Dec 2013, at 19:57, "Lou Burnard" <lou.burnard at retired.ox.ac.uk> wrote:
>>> Of course when a whole element is deprecated (e.g. relationGrp) the
>>> examples of usage *in that element spec* are not going to disappear
>>> until the element itself does. Or are we suggesting they should?
>> I think I suggest they should. We have decided to zap the beast, so stage one is to remove examples of its use.
>
> Even from the tagdoc that describes them? that seems a bit harsh, as
> well as falsifying the historical record. Maybe I'll just comment the
> little suckers out.
>

--
Martin Holmes
University of Victoria Humanities Computing and Media Centre
(mholmes at uvic.ca)
--
tei-council mailing list
tei-council at lists.village.Virginia.EDU
http://lists.village.Virginia.EDU/mailman/listinfo/tei-council

PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived